Love to make deals with people who lie constantly
November 10, 2025 at 7:03 PM
Love to make deals with people who lie constantly
Yeah I think that’s right re where the pressure was coming from. It’s tough to negotiate when one side still feels some duty to govern responsibly and the other doesn’t. I think they also didn’t want to work over thanksgiving weekend
November 10, 2025 at 2:40 PM
Yeah I think that’s right re where the pressure was coming from. It’s tough to negotiate when one side still feels some duty to govern responsibly and the other doesn’t. I think they also didn’t want to work over thanksgiving weekend
Giving in and receiving nothing when you’re clearly negotiating from a position of strength is utterly baffling to me
November 10, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Giving in and receiving nothing when you’re clearly negotiating from a position of strength is utterly baffling to me
He’s mainly focused on other team-related naming issues
November 9, 2025 at 11:27 PM
He’s mainly focused on other team-related naming issues
Needs to lose his leadership position immediately. Absolute garbage instincts on everything. Beyond me that he’d be looking to deal after winning big last week
November 9, 2025 at 6:05 PM
Needs to lose his leadership position immediately. Absolute garbage instincts on everything. Beyond me that he’d be looking to deal after winning big last week
Given this level of sophistication, we can all understand why it took so long to develop this switch watch of a policy
November 9, 2025 at 2:53 PM
Given this level of sophistication, we can all understand why it took so long to develop this switch watch of a policy
Love the bit about how respondents are bound to lose because the executive doesn’t act arbitrarily and capriciously when following the command of a statute but this executive consistently wins when it violates the command of congress
November 7, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Love the bit about how respondents are bound to lose because the executive doesn’t act arbitrarily and capriciously when following the command of a statute but this executive consistently wins when it violates the command of congress
All the starving children are doing their part!
November 6, 2025 at 6:32 PM
All the starving children are doing their part!
Go away. You’re ruining it
November 5, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Go away. You’re ruining it
Truly is insane that Nixon losing the White House—a relatively moderate sanction for his criminality—was seen as so unfair by a sufficient number of psychopaths that they ensured future fellow travelers would never face any real repercussions
November 4, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Truly is insane that Nixon losing the White House—a relatively moderate sanction for his criminality—was seen as so unfair by a sufficient number of psychopaths that they ensured future fellow travelers would never face any real repercussions
Hard to get injured when no one in the fight can throw a decent punch
November 3, 2025 at 5:44 PM
Hard to get injured when no one in the fight can throw a decent punch
Classic conservative legal thinking: use a provision meant to prevent unfair discrimination against SNAP users to stop people from voluntarily helping them
November 2, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Classic conservative legal thinking: use a provision meant to prevent unfair discrimination against SNAP users to stop people from voluntarily helping them
I’ve been waiting my entire adult life for the great, secret republican healthcare plan
November 2, 2025 at 6:59 PM
I’ve been waiting my entire adult life for the great, secret republican healthcare plan
It makes sense that a guy anodyne enough that the Obama Whitehouse thought he would be palatable to senate republicans turned out to be so destructively passive
November 2, 2025 at 1:21 PM
It makes sense that a guy anodyne enough that the Obama Whitehouse thought he would be palatable to senate republicans turned out to be so destructively passive
I’m like damn how is THAT the first page I tore out?!?
November 1, 2025 at 12:14 AM
I’m like damn how is THAT the first page I tore out?!?