Timlagor
@timlagor.bsky.social
The ice has been melting for *decades*.
Ice doesn't stop melting when you stop raising the thermostat.
(he/him)
Ice doesn't stop melting when you stop raising the thermostat.
(he/him)
It's not dead yet but I sure hope it's on its way there.
November 19, 2025 at 11:30 PM
It's not dead yet but I sure hope it's on its way there.
It is a bubble-fraud
If it weren't you would see actual value to customers (absent) without destroying the biosphere, trashing the water table and plagiarising everything in sight (all happening).
Even the LLM companies aren't making money (only the scammers running them)
If it weren't you would see actual value to customers (absent) without destroying the biosphere, trashing the water table and plagiarising everything in sight (all happening).
Even the LLM companies aren't making money (only the scammers running them)
November 19, 2025 at 11:30 PM
It is a bubble-fraud
If it weren't you would see actual value to customers (absent) without destroying the biosphere, trashing the water table and plagiarising everything in sight (all happening).
Even the LLM companies aren't making money (only the scammers running them)
If it weren't you would see actual value to customers (absent) without destroying the biosphere, trashing the water table and plagiarising everything in sight (all happening).
Even the LLM companies aren't making money (only the scammers running them)
Indeed and you get a lot *more* total wealth that way too.
Keynesisanism is incomplete not wrong (mostly) -unlike the buffoons who have dominated economic policy for the last 50 years.
Keynesisanism is incomplete not wrong (mostly) -unlike the buffoons who have dominated economic policy for the last 50 years.
November 19, 2025 at 11:26 PM
Indeed and you get a lot *more* total wealth that way too.
Keynesisanism is incomplete not wrong (mostly) -unlike the buffoons who have dominated economic policy for the last 50 years.
Keynesisanism is incomplete not wrong (mostly) -unlike the buffoons who have dominated economic policy for the last 50 years.
They can add it to the bill that requires every subscription to be at least as easy to cancel as to start.
November 19, 2025 at 8:19 PM
They can add it to the bill that requires every subscription to be at least as easy to cancel as to start.
That would be lovely but very often there's no way to disable them at all.
One easy one though is to stop using Google and any Facebook site. You can cut out your Amazon purchases while you're at it (plenty of other sites exist -often you can get the product direct from the same seller).
One easy one though is to stop using Google and any Facebook site. You can cut out your Amazon purchases while you're at it (plenty of other sites exist -often you can get the product direct from the same seller).
November 19, 2025 at 8:13 PM
That would be lovely but very often there's no way to disable them at all.
One easy one though is to stop using Google and any Facebook site. You can cut out your Amazon purchases while you're at it (plenty of other sites exist -often you can get the product direct from the same seller).
One easy one though is to stop using Google and any Facebook site. You can cut out your Amazon purchases while you're at it (plenty of other sites exist -often you can get the product direct from the same seller).
That's good but I hope Green's will be able to target ALL Labour MPs.
November 19, 2025 at 8:08 PM
That's good but I hope Green's will be able to target ALL Labour MPs.
Even if he became an MP there's 0% chance of him getting on a Labour Leadership ballot
November 19, 2025 at 8:07 PM
Even if he became an MP there's 0% chance of him getting on a Labour Leadership ballot
No one who thought it was OK to be a Labour MP in 2022 has my respect let alone thinking it's OK in 2025
November 19, 2025 at 8:06 PM
No one who thought it was OK to be a Labour MP in 2022 has my respect let alone thinking it's OK in 2025
Pros:
1) Rupert likes it
2) Our other sponsors like it
3) They'll give us cushy sinecures when we get thrown out
1) Rupert likes it
2) Our other sponsors like it
3) They'll give us cushy sinecures when we get thrown out
November 19, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Pros:
1) Rupert likes it
2) Our other sponsors like it
3) They'll give us cushy sinecures when we get thrown out
1) Rupert likes it
2) Our other sponsors like it
3) They'll give us cushy sinecures when we get thrown out
The solution is to organise inside the Democrat Party and throw out the people running it though. That's still easier than defeating it from outside.
It does require dedicated organisation for factional fighting though not holier-than-thou superciliousness.
It does require dedicated organisation for factional fighting though not holier-than-thou superciliousness.
November 19, 2025 at 8:03 PM
The solution is to organise inside the Democrat Party and throw out the people running it though. That's still easier than defeating it from outside.
It does require dedicated organisation for factional fighting though not holier-than-thou superciliousness.
It does require dedicated organisation for factional fighting though not holier-than-thou superciliousness.
They start from the false premise that political policy can't change and their lifestyles are inviolate so their framework for what's "possible" already excludes all the physically possible outcomes.
November 19, 2025 at 7:53 PM
They start from the false premise that political policy can't change and their lifestyles are inviolate so their framework for what's "possible" already excludes all the physically possible outcomes.
..and thus proving that the "budget" was wrong
November 19, 2025 at 7:51 PM
..and thus proving that the "budget" was wrong