Me vs. ADT for $8K
banner
timeforus.org
Me vs. ADT for $8K
@timeforus.org
ADT has received my demand for $8,010.15.
This isn’t a mission—it’s an opportunity for accountability.
📆 Daily thread. 🎯 Texas law. 🕰️ Archive at www.timeforus.org
👉 Follow along. See how it ends.
169/
Here’s the summary email I sent that evening.

It confirmed what Amy had agreed to and restated expectations for the revised offer. I put everything into the bullet-point structure that had worked well previously.

#TimeForUs #Clarity
November 11, 2025 at 3:21 PM
166/
I accomplished my goal.

Amy did not seem thrilled, but she agreed to send over a correctly formatted offer.

She explained what she felt she had to, but ultimately chose the path forward.

#TimeForUs #NextSteps
November 8, 2025 at 6:18 PM
161/
Check out the email.

ADT was blurring the line between an “agreement in principle” and an actual offer — and suggesting the next step would be a release.

That’s not how this works.

#TimeForUs #Legal
November 3, 2025 at 3:01 PM
157/
Here’s the email I sent from my hotel room that night.

I thanked her for removing the NDA, then pivoted to setting appropriate ground rules for future formal offers. Finally, I re-established the Friday deadline for a corrected offer.

#TimeForUs #structuredapproach
October 30, 2025 at 2:42 PM
154/
Here is Amy's response.

I was starting to notice a pattern. Amy might have some issues or be unhappy about what I was saying, but ultimately she seemed to agree to what I was asking.

#TimeForUs #Progress
October 27, 2025 at 2:38 PM
151/
Here’s the email with the references I provided.

I had no intention of more back and forth that day. ADT was down to two options: they would need to signal their intent to provide a legally valid offer or they would declare impasse.

#TimeForUs #TexasLaw
October 24, 2025 at 3:21 PM
146/
Here’s the email.

In addition to asking about the specific Texas law, she also asked what I would request in return for confidentiality. For a moment, it looked like progress.

#TimeForUs #Negotiation
October 19, 2025 at 3:55 PM
142/
Here’s the email.

The timeline I set previously was deliberate and firm. This wasn’t the moment to hedge or soften, so I added a reminder.

#TimeForUs #Communication
October 15, 2025 at 5:59 PM
134/
My reply was firm. I clarified that what ADT had provided wasn’t a legally valid offer and gave them a clear timeline to fix it.

Also, for the first time, I mentioned the public record I’d started keeping.

Here’s that email.

#TimeForUs #timeline
October 7, 2025 at 6:36 PM
125/
Here’s Amy’s response.

She seemed satisfied with where things were at.
I wasn't quite on the same page.

#TimeForUs #NextSteps
September 28, 2025 at 6:09 PM
124/
The first thing to do was confirm receipt.

That would give me time to think through what they had written.

#TimeForUs #Received
September 27, 2025 at 7:30 PM
123/
Here is the email they called an offer. Take a look.

The only thing I’ll add today is that I was happy to see their starting number was $3,000 :-)

#TimeForUs #ConsumerProtection #Legal
September 26, 2025 at 2:46 PM
119/
Her response was short.

She thanked me, indicated I hhad cleared up the confusion, and gave me a timeline.

Here’s her reply:

#TimeForUs #Response
September 22, 2025 at 3:49 PM
116/
Here’s my reply.

I welcomed a full resolution — but on clear terms.
Past harms, future obligations, and NDA are separate categories.
And therefore, I reaffirmed that any “all-in” deal had to go beyond $8,010.15 for past harms.

#TimeForUs #AccountabilityCulture
September 19, 2025 at 3:17 PM
110/
For the first time, Amy tried some strategy of her own.

She hinted ADT wanted everything resolved, not just the demand.

And then she offered her personal cell — even though we’d never spoken, only emailed.

#TimeForUs #Personal
September 13, 2025 at 4:01 PM
106/
Here’s the email I sent.

First, notice the time gap.

I took nearly 4 hours to respond. I had decided that if my reply was going to be substantive, it was not going to be an emotional reaction.

#TimeForUs #Deliberate
September 9, 2025 at 4:47 PM
103/
Here’s the email.

I realized what was happening: Amy was trying to devalue my claim.

If she got me to agree to cut the $950 panel cost, that wouldn’t just shrink actual damages — it would also lower potential treble damages under the Texas DTPA.

#TimeForUs #Negotiation
September 6, 2025 at 6:46 PM
101/

At first, I got a very quick reply, “Thank you! I’ll be in touch.”

#TimeForUs #ThankYou
September 4, 2025 at 3:55 PM
100/
Here’s the email I sent breaking down the $2,010.15 in actual damages:

- Panel replacement
- Overbilling
- Payments while unusable
- Time & effort

This was as of May 16. Since then? The total has only gone higher.

#TimeForUs #Damages
September 3, 2025 at 3:01 PM
98/
Here’s her email.

Amy asked me to explain the damages I was claiming — $2,010.15.

I thought I’d already done that in my demand letter, but fine — I was happy to answer again.

#TimeForUs #Damages
September 1, 2025 at 5:59 PM
95/
For better or worse, 12 minutes later Amy replied: she would “keep this information in mind.”

Twelve minutes… she probably read it, but didn’t think about it at all. Back to waiting.

#TimeForUs #wait
August 29, 2025 at 3:51 PM
93/
I sent it with the subject line: “Quick Note Before Your Offer is Finalized.”

The tone was courteous — but the message was firm: only a month-to-month agreement is defensible, and an NDA would require separate consideration.

#TimeForUs #Communication
August 27, 2025 at 9:47 PM
88/
Her response came fast — less than 10 minutes.

Confirming receipt. And wishing me a good weekend.

#TimeForUs #Received
August 22, 2025 at 4:44 PM
87/
Back to business.

After reviewing everything, I sent my response — with the documents attached — to lock in the agreement exactly as planned.

#TimeForUs #Countersigned
August 21, 2025 at 5:13 PM
84/
Here’s the email Amy sent later that day.

She basically split out the bullet points I’d provided — perfect. And she laid out the documents I’d send, just as we discussed.

#TimeForUs #offers
August 18, 2025 at 6:09 PM