@tijra.bsky.social
Their followers don’t think for themselves; they blindly repeat talking points, attack, bully, and abuse others. That is not advocacy. That’s abuse.
September 7, 2025 at 2:19 AM
Their followers don’t think for themselves; they blindly repeat talking points, attack, bully, and abuse others. That is not advocacy. That’s abuse.
They go after Drake Bell because he’s an easy target, not because the facts support it. They can’t confront their own abusers, so they pour their anger into him instead.
September 7, 2025 at 2:19 AM
They go after Drake Bell because he’s an easy target, not because the facts support it. They can’t confront their own abusers, so they pour their anger into him instead.
They ignored Alexa’s trauma. They ignored Drake Bell’s trauma. He is nothing like his abuser. What he was guilty of was being unprofessional and careless about who he was talking to online. When he found out the truth, he blocked her. That’s it. He was stupid, not a pedophile, groomer, or predator.
September 7, 2025 at 2:19 AM
They ignored Alexa’s trauma. They ignored Drake Bell’s trauma. He is nothing like his abuser. What he was guilty of was being unprofessional and careless about who he was talking to online. When he found out the truth, he blocked her. That’s it. He was stupid, not a pedophile, groomer, or predator.
People like Kat Tenbarge, Crow, AC, “Ophie Dokie” (or whatever her name is), Adam, and their followers have become abusers themselves.
September 7, 2025 at 2:19 AM
People like Kat Tenbarge, Crow, AC, “Ophie Dokie” (or whatever her name is), Adam, and their followers have become abusers themselves.
He was charged because, in Ohio, it doesn’t matter if the profile was fake; what matters is that the person was a minor. That’s why he was charged.
September 6, 2025 at 7:11 PM
He was charged because, in Ohio, it doesn’t matter if the profile was fake; what matters is that the person was a minor. That’s why he was charged.
About his case: he replied to a fake profile of someone who pretended to be an adult. Once he learned the person’s real age, he blocked them. Nothing physical happened, and he didn’t send any images.
September 6, 2025 at 7:11 PM
About his case: he replied to a fake profile of someone who pretended to be an adult. Once he learned the person’s real age, he blocked them. Nothing physical happened, and he didn’t send any images.
He was never on the run. His case ended in 2021. He lives in Orlando with his son and travels to Mexico for tours and projects, since he’s always had a larger fan base there.
September 6, 2025 at 7:11 PM
He was never on the run. His case ended in 2021. He lives in Orlando with his son and travels to Mexico for tours and projects, since he’s always had a larger fan base there.
Both the defense and prosecution confirmed that nothing physical happened and no images were sent. The prosecution did not dispute this. And when Drake Bell learned her real age, he blocked her.
September 6, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Both the defense and prosecution confirmed that nothing physical happened and no images were sent. The prosecution did not dispute this. And when Drake Bell learned her real age, he blocked her.
He pled guilty to child endangerment (for causing emotional harm) and to disseminating material to a minor because of the nature of the messages, not images. The judge explicitly stated this was not a sex case and did not involve sexual relations.
September 6, 2025 at 3:40 PM
He pled guilty to child endangerment (for causing emotional harm) and to disseminating material to a minor because of the nature of the messages, not images. The judge explicitly stated this was not a sex case and did not involve sexual relations.
Alexa has explained the Drake Bell case countless times, yet people keep twisting it. Let’s be clear: saying he pled guilty is true. But saying he pled guilty to sexual assault or sending images is outright misinformation.
September 6, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Alexa has explained the Drake Bell case countless times, yet people keep twisting it. Let’s be clear: saying he pled guilty is true. But saying he pled guilty to sexual assault or sending images is outright misinformation.
Multiple citations do not guarantee correctness, each source must be reliable and correctly represented. If the sources themselves contain errors or misinterpretations, Wikipedia should reflect that and not present it as fact.
September 4, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Multiple citations do not guarantee correctness, each source must be reliable and correctly represented. If the sources themselves contain errors or misinterpretations, Wikipedia should reflect that and not present it as fact.
The fact that the article hasn’t been retracted doesn’t make the information accurate. Wikipedia’s standards require content to be verifiable and neutral, not just present.
September 4, 2025 at 9:14 PM
The fact that the article hasn’t been retracted doesn’t make the information accurate. Wikipedia’s standards require content to be verifiable and neutral, not just present.
Both the prosecution and the defense confirmed that nothing physical occurred. The situation involved only reckless messages, and the failure to verify her age stemmed from her using a fake account.
September 4, 2025 at 9:12 PM
Both the prosecution and the defense confirmed that nothing physical occurred. The situation involved only reckless messages, and the failure to verify her age stemmed from her using a fake account.
Nothing in this statement indicates that any sexual activity occurred, which aligns with the fact that the judge confirmed it wasn’t a sexual case.
September 4, 2025 at 9:12 PM
Nothing in this statement indicates that any sexual activity occurred, which aligns with the fact that the judge confirmed it wasn’t a sexual case.
As he clearly states in the ABC News article you linked, he took responsibility and pleaded guilty due to financial pressure and not wanting to put his family through more stress.
September 4, 2025 at 9:09 PM
As he clearly states in the ABC News article you linked, he took responsibility and pleaded guilty due to financial pressure and not wanting to put his family through more stress.
This is not true. I’ve reported false information on other articles, including historical entries and pages about artists, and Wikipedia did not remove the inaccurate content.
September 4, 2025 at 9:06 PM
This is not true. I’ve reported false information on other articles, including historical entries and pages about artists, and Wikipedia did not remove the inaccurate content.
The Wikipedia page cites the New York Times article, which was later retracted because it falsely claimed he was registered. Despite this, Wikipedia hasn’t removed the information or updated it to reflect the retraction.
September 4, 2025 at 9:04 PM
The Wikipedia page cites the New York Times article, which was later retracted because it falsely claimed he was registered. Despite this, Wikipedia hasn’t removed the information or updated it to reflect the retraction.
Because they were proven false.
August 26, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Because they were proven false.
No, he’s not on any registry or in any offender database. The case involved reckless messaging, specifically, not verifying her age before blocking her. It had nothing sexual involved. The judge and both legal teams confirmed this clearly.
July 7, 2025 at 11:51 AM
No, he’s not on any registry or in any offender database. The case involved reckless messaging, specifically, not verifying her age before blocking her. It had nothing sexual involved. The judge and both legal teams confirmed this clearly.
News articles retracted their statements last year, and he is not listed in any database. He was charged with attempted endangerment for being reckless and not doing more to verify the age before blocking the account and for causing emotional harm, not for any physical or sexual misconduct.
May 27, 2025 at 2:42 PM
News articles retracted their statements last year, and he is not listed in any database. He was charged with attempted endangerment for being reckless and not doing more to verify the age before blocking the account and for causing emotional harm, not for any physical or sexual misconduct.
The judge made it clear this wasn’t a sex case, and all parties agreed before sentencing that nothing physical happened. He didn’t send any pictures, and he is not a registered offender.
May 27, 2025 at 2:42 PM
The judge made it clear this wasn’t a sex case, and all parties agreed before sentencing that nothing physical happened. He didn’t send any pictures, and he is not a registered offender.
He didn’t do anything wrong. If he had, his ex wouldn’t allow him to be around without supervision. All he did was respond to a fake account of someone pretending to be an adult. As soon as he learned the real age, he blocked her.
May 27, 2025 at 2:41 PM
He didn’t do anything wrong. If he had, his ex wouldn’t allow him to be around without supervision. All he did was respond to a fake account of someone pretending to be an adult. As soon as he learned the real age, he blocked her.