What does feudal imply and not imply with regard to Tibet? There also wasn’t slavery. No, this wasn’t why Nazis were interested.

Tibet wasn’t a slave state. Go ahead and cite an academic source for this claim.

Why must China need to keep a militant and authoritarian presence against Tibetans in order to control Tibet?

What exactly does this show?

What is pro-slavery on the page?

Who knows. Anyone can make up a caption to a photo op.

Tibet didn’t have slavery.

China is. What’s sinophobic?

He justifies China’s actions. Don’t know what to tell you.

Tibet didn’t have slavery. Go ahead and cite an academic source for this claim.

Also ironic that you have a Palestine flag as China is just like Israel. You don’t actually care about Palestinians. You only care about your political ideology and are using their suffering. It’s disgusting.

lol I’ll be blocked because it goes against your narrative? You’re the one that said you don’t know anything about Tibet. Why don’t want to stay ignorant?

Well, for one the 17 point agreement. As for being oppressed, tel me what sources are acceptable to you so I don’t waste my time.

Certainly. So which “bold” claim exactly?

Wait, do you not know anything about Tibet?

Freeing isn’t invading, annexing, and oppressing a country.

Free Tibet!