thomaswoodside.bsky.social
@thomaswoodside.bsky.social
And I saved the best for last
July 9, 2025 at 7:06 PM
@TeriOlle of Economic Security California Action
July 9, 2025 at 7:06 PM
@SnehaRevanur of Encode AI.
July 9, 2025 at 7:06 PM
CEO of Elicit @stuhlmueller.
July 9, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Prolific startup founder @snewmanpv.
July 9, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Nobel Prize winner @geoffreyhinton.
July 9, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Bruce Reed of @CommonSense, and also President Biden's former Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy.
July 9, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Very lucky to have @Yoshua_Bengio's support.
July 9, 2025 at 7:06 PM
SB 53 is an important step forward. See the full text here: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billT...
July 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM
The bill includes provisions on policies and reporting of risks from internal deployment of AI systems. This mirrors a recommendation in Governor Newsom’s report that I was very happy to see.
July 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM
As the Report recommends, SB 53 also provides the Attorney General the authority to update the definition of “large developer.” But the Attorney General is expressly forbidden from covering companies that aren’t well-resourced or are behind the frontier of AI development.
July 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM
SB 53 applies only to large AI developers that have trained a foundation model with 10^26 floating point operations (FLOPs) of compute. This means companies spending hundreds of millions of dollars on AI development.
July 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM
Finally, SB 53 continues to include provisions on whistleblower protections and a public cloud computing cluster, CalCompute, which were present in SB 1047 last year and have been widely popular.
July 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM
Third, it requires large companies to report a set of critical safety incidents caused by their AI models to the Attorney General.
July 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM
Second, it requires large companies to report on the risk evaluations they are doing for catastrophic risks. This includes justifications for releasing risky models, sometimes called “safety cases.”
July 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM
First, the bill requires the largest AI companies to have, publish, and follow a safety and security protocol. This mirrors voluntary commitments that companies have already made.
July 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM
SB 53 is focused on catastrophic risks, defined as a small subset of risks that could result in more than 100 deaths or injuries or more than $1B in damages. The Report warned that evidence for these risks is “growing.”
July 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM
In 2024, in the wake of his veto of SB 1047, Governor Newsom established a working group to study how California should respond to risks from advanced AI systems. The working group recently returned a report, which SB 53 draws from.
July 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM