So many communities and fields in this space, but as I see it there is a big difference between the fields ”science of learning” and ”learning sciences”. The latter, at least as expressed through ISLS is a much broader project that is now indistinguishable from educational research generally

That’s interesting!

I might be misunderstanding this but it’s interesting and potentially moves the line so that weights can be considered personal data and/or direct derivatives of works. I’m not really sure how this leads to increased transparency in practice though. Outputs still can’t be traced back to inputs, or?