That's "basic" vs "advanced" indexing 😁

I just think it's worth clarifying for people who read your tweet

Reminder: A paper under review should not be fed to chatGPT (from the ICCV reviewer guidelines)

🔍 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲 is based on an animated movie providing a variety of motions and high-quality textures

🔍 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲 introduces 3 benchmarking scenarios for common setups: Dense, Sparse, Monocular

🔍 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲 offers high-quality RGB images accompanied by depth, segmentation, optical flow, dynamic masks, normals

Wait, this data is from the "It's about time" paper by Yang, Xie and Zisserman, right?

Their conclusion was that synthetic data works though: "We show that the model trained on the proposed synthetic dataset generalizes towards real clocks with good accuracy, advocating a Sim2Real training regime"

But at least we can easily share links to project pages, etc. 😅

Now approaching 20M users with a growing growth rate (+11 users per second)

That's one solution, but if there is a fee to enter it cannot really be described as a public square anymore.

To be clear, I have no strong preference for Bluesky over other Twitter alternatives. I'm just glad that critical mass has been reached on one of them.

I'm not sure twitter has a lot of legitimacy left to be described as the public square. Some major news outlets like the Guardian have already decided to stop publishing on it.