thewikipedian.bsky.social
@thewikipedian.bsky.social
7/7 Whoever gets the job takes on one of the hardest roles in the nonprofit world. Read the full post here: www.thewikipedian.net/p/wikimedia-...
Who Should Run Wikipedia Next?
Wikipedia’s future depends on making the right hire. What should the next WMF CEO look like?
www.thewikipedian.net
June 24, 2025 at 1:44 PM
6/ The real challenge: Wikipedia is publishing, tech, community, and a global nonprofit all at once. No one can be everything to everyone—but the next CEO will have to try.
June 24, 2025 at 1:44 PM
5/ There’s no consensus on how to respond. Some say WMF needs tech leadership; others say not so fast. Few want a political hire, but the only name offered was former US CTO Megan Smith.
June 24, 2025 at 1:44 PM
4/ Two dark clouds loom over Wikipedia’s future: generative AI, which depends on it but draws attention away, and rising political threats to open knowledge in the US, UK, and India.
June 24, 2025 at 1:44 PM
3/ Some wonder if the Foundation is doing the right job at all—raising concerns about its size, fundraising style, and spending. Has WMF gotten too big to keep up with changing media habits?
June 24, 2025 at 1:44 PM
2/ The good news for Iskander: her leadership got high marks for listening, facilitating, and not playing the hero. The catch? What most people want sounds a lot like... Maryana Iskander.
June 24, 2025 at 1:44 PM
5/ Wikipedia isn’t perfect. But its flaws are debated in the open, by a community that cares deeply about facts. The WMF now faces a choice: bend to a bad-faith inquiry—or stand up to this intimidation. www.thewikipedian.net/p/maga-wikip...
Wikipedia Got a Letter from the Government the Other Day
A Trump official's risible letter to the Wikimedia Foundation represents a real attempt to intimidate an institution it cannot control
www.thewikipedian.net
May 2, 2025 at 2:03 PM
4/ The right has been laying the groundwork for this for years. Wikipedia is open, collaborative, and built on consensus—everything MAGA hates. Now it’s being folded into the broader campaign to delegitimize institutions beyond its reach. www.thewikipedian.net/p/maga-wikip...
May 2, 2025 at 2:03 PM
3/ Martin isn’t the IRS. His office has no role in nonprofit oversight. But that isn't the point. Instead, the letter repackages long-standing grievances from MAGA circles as official concern. www.thewikipedian.net/p/maga-wikip...
May 2, 2025 at 2:03 PM
2/ The letter demands documents and answers to 12 questions by May 15. Martin claims Wikipedia’s global contributors “subvert American interests,” and implies Google and AI companies are laundering biased content via Wikipedia. He cites no evidence. www.thewikipedian.net/p/maga-wikip...
May 2, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Loved the deep dive—nothing like exploring a good Wikipedia rabbit hole.
February 24, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Fin/ So what should happen? Should the WMF step in, as it did in Croatia? Or should Wikipedia communities settle this themselves? The future of Hebrew Wikipedia—and maybe more—is at stake. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
The Fight for Hebrew Wikipedia Puts the Wikimedia Foundation in a No-Win Situation
An existential crisis at the Hebrew Wikipedia mirrors Israel's deepening divides—and the world's. Now, the WMF must decide whether to step in.
www.thewikipedian.net
February 20, 2025 at 9:24 PM
7/ Now the WMF must decide: intervene and risk inflaming critics, or do nothing and watch Hebrew Wikipedia become even more insular? It’s a test of whether institutions can still act—or if they will continue standing by as consensus collapses. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
February 20, 2025 at 9:24 PM
6/ This isn’t the first time a Wikipedia has been "captured" by one side. In the 2010s, Croatian Wikipedia was taken over by a far-right faction. The WMF finally intervened in 2021, stripping power from admins and resetting governance. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
February 20, 2025 at 9:24 PM
5/ The conflict is influencing site content, too. In 2021, Hebrew Wikipedia changed the article "Israeli occupation of the West Bank" to "Israeli rule in Judea and Samaria"—a nationalist framing. The fight over content is also a fight for control. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
February 20, 2025 at 9:24 PM
4/ The secular editors want the WMF to step in. The nationalists say the other side engaged in its own off-wiki coordination, and besides, most hewiki editors agree, and by the way they most every claim in the RfC is false. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
February 20, 2025 at 9:24 PM
3/ This fight isn’t just about Wikipedia. It’s happening against the backdrop of Israel’s biggest political crises in decades—from the October 7 Hamas attack and Gaza invasion to Netanyahu’s judicial overhaul and the dominant far-right coalition. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
February 20, 2025 at 9:24 PM
2/ In December, an 11,000-word Request for Comment (RfC) dropped, alleging that a religious-nationalist faction had seized power in hewiki. The claim: they mass-banned progressive and secular editors, then used the bans to cement control in the next election. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
February 20, 2025 at 9:24 PM
8/ The bottom line: Wikipedia isn’t "leftist". It just values accuracy over ideology. And that’s why right-wing activists are trying to turn it into another culture war battleground. www.thewikipedian.net/p/right-wing...
The Right’s War on Wikipedia is Just a Repackaging of its War on Journalism
In its exaggerated critique of Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources, the Media Research Center attempts a striking feat of false equivalence
www.thewikipedian.net
February 13, 2025 at 3:11 PM
7/ Wikipedia has become too institutionally important for the right to ignore. Like their broader war on journalism, conservatives are attacking it not because it’s unfair, but because it won’t bend to their narrative. www.thewikipedian.net/p/right-wing...
February 13, 2025 at 3:11 PM