MMT just describes national accounting. There's nothing to "seize".
MMT just describes national accounting. There's nothing to "seize".
Try again.
Try again.
This should be good. Is it as good as "MMT means giving everyone millions of pounds!"?
I'm going to assume you'll just double down, deflect, and keep trolling with bad argumentation and fallacies as you have been doing.
This should be good. Is it as good as "MMT means giving everyone millions of pounds!"?
I'm going to assume you'll just double down, deflect, and keep trolling with bad argumentation and fallacies as you have been doing.
You've literally zero evidence.
You've literally zero evidence.
I also think Post-Keynesians are mostly correct on this topic, and Paul Krugman who isn't a Post-Keynesian, is not.
I also think Post-Keynesians are mostly correct on this topic, and Paul Krugman who isn't a Post-Keynesian, is not.
If you could cite the source of this argument, with an actual quote, that would be helpful.
If you could cite the source of this argument, with an actual quote, that would be helpful.
The award doesn't make Krugman some infallible bastion of all economic knowledge and understanding.
The award doesn't make Krugman some infallible bastion of all economic knowledge and understanding.
Reeves is just George Osborne in a skirt, but maybe without the cocaine habit. Both clueless about macroeconomics.
Reeves is just George Osborne in a skirt, but maybe without the cocaine habit. Both clueless about macroeconomics.
Both "sirs" incidentally. They toss out those knighthoods to some right fuck-knuckles.
Both "sirs" incidentally. They toss out those knighthoods to some right fuck-knuckles.