Some words have changed in spelling (to-day, good-by), they use some rather archaic words, and sometimes the sentence structure and use of punctuation is different to what I'm used to—but that might also be because I'm not a native English speaker. 2/2

Also made me realise how the current President is probably the worst possible person to make such a decision.

And the open ending is great in forcing the viewer to think about how they would respond, what option they would pick, what they would do. 5/5

I really like the three different perspectives because they show multiple aspects of a response to an ICBM launch very well. The first perspective tricks you into assuming that they have to successfully intercept the missile, because there's still so much movie left. And the they don't. 4/5

The movie builds and maintains tension very well throughout, especially with the timer and the DEFCON levels. The contrast between joking and friendly conversations before the failure to intercept and the desperate reactions and breaking of protocol afterwards adds to the tension pretty well. 3/5

The characters are great, they feel like people with believable relationships and lives and at the same time competent professionals placed in an overwhelming situation, which results in realistic terror and very human reactions. 2/5

Switching to another playlist fixed the problem. Was kind of getting used to it at this point.

Doesn't seem to affect the songs after it, they seem to be random every time.

Is misread illegal as legal, so the answer is no.

To rephrase more clearly: this is legal.

Wikipedia content is under CC BY-SA 4.0, so yes.

creativecommons.org/licenses/by-...

And sometimes it just drives into another vehicle and then immediately disables itself. Very cyberpunk!

Overall, it's a pretty fun action film, if you can overlook the usual strange understanding of geopolitics and the fact that, in the film, most European nations seem to have neither a police force nor a military.