Lover of music and video games who is, (un?)fortunately, perpetually stuck in 2005.
I'll just leave this thread here and wish you a day that's precisely as nice as you are. ♥ (And a very happy block.)
x.com/ClaireMCorle...
I'll just leave this thread here and wish you a day that's precisely as nice as you are. ♥ (And a very happy block.)
x.com/ClaireMCorle...
You also don't have to care what *I* have to say, but thought you might value what the alleged victim herself had to say. 🤷♂️
You also don't have to care what *I* have to say, but thought you might value what the alleged victim herself had to say. 🤷♂️
Meanwhile, you came in with a foregone conclusion ("Gabe bad") and enough projection to fill an IMAX theater. The facts are out there for all who care to read and get informed. I'll be blocking and moving on; have a great day.
Meanwhile, you came in with a foregone conclusion ("Gabe bad") and enough projection to fill an IMAX theater. The facts are out there for all who care to read and get informed. I'll be blocking and moving on; have a great day.
*Working* with her *and her family* (and Michelle's family). The families wouldn't have allowed it if anything weird was going on.
They didn't start dating until she was 20, and *she* asked *him* out.
*Working* with her *and her family* (and Michelle's family). The families wouldn't have allowed it if anything weird was going on.
They didn't start dating until she was 20, and *she* asked *him* out.
As in, "oh honey, you ARE a victim, you just don't know it. We know better than you."
(Not talking about you specifically, but this entire pattern.)
Whatever happened to "listen to victims"?
As in, "oh honey, you ARE a victim, you just don't know it. We know better than you."
(Not talking about you specifically, but this entire pattern.)
Whatever happened to "listen to victims"?
If the "victim" (a grown-ass woman) tells you it's not true...then it's not true.
The burden of proof is on the people making the accusation anyway.
She + Michelle explained everything. For fuller context: x.com/colubird/sta...
If the "victim" (a grown-ass woman) tells you it's not true...then it's not true.
The burden of proof is on the people making the accusation anyway.
She + Michelle explained everything. For fuller context: x.com/colubird/sta...
Or go about your day and stay out of it, because it's likely way more complex and nuanced than you know.
And remember the human being on the other side of the screen (who is also more complex than you're imagining).
Or go about your day and stay out of it, because it's likely way more complex and nuanced than you know.
And remember the human being on the other side of the screen (who is also more complex than you're imagining).
You didn't have to take a side, but you did; at least own it if you get it wrong.
You didn't have to take a side, but you did; at least own it if you get it wrong.
But that doesn't work when you don't know who's telling the truth. If it's a false accusation, the accuser is the oppressor, and the victim of the slander/libel is the oppressed.
But that doesn't work when you don't know who's telling the truth. If it's a false accusation, the accuser is the oppressor, and the victim of the slander/libel is the oppressed.