Théo Valentin
@theovalentinecon.bsky.social
Econ PhD student @crestumr.bsky.social, @ipparis.bsky.social in Public Economics, Taxation
Reposted by Théo Valentin
🎓 Job Market 2025 – CREST-IP Paris
Meet Théo Valentin (IP Paris) 🏛️
His #JobMarketPaper studies how corporate tax cuts affect small firms — via learning frictions, operational adjustments, and entry/splitting decisions 📊
Théo's JMP here: www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/evq39...
#EconJobMarket #PublicEconomics
Meet Théo Valentin (IP Paris) 🏛️
His #JobMarketPaper studies how corporate tax cuts affect small firms — via learning frictions, operational adjustments, and entry/splitting decisions 📊
Théo's JMP here: www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/evq39...
#EconJobMarket #PublicEconomics
November 6, 2025 at 8:44 AM
🎓 Job Market 2025 – CREST-IP Paris
Meet Théo Valentin (IP Paris) 🏛️
His #JobMarketPaper studies how corporate tax cuts affect small firms — via learning frictions, operational adjustments, and entry/splitting decisions 📊
Théo's JMP here: www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/evq39...
#EconJobMarket #PublicEconomics
Meet Théo Valentin (IP Paris) 🏛️
His #JobMarketPaper studies how corporate tax cuts affect small firms — via learning frictions, operational adjustments, and entry/splitting decisions 📊
Théo's JMP here: www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/evq39...
#EconJobMarket #PublicEconomics
Reposted by Théo Valentin
Revealing real-time indoor air pollution cuts it by 17 percent overall, 34 percent when occupied. Lower-income households face worse indoor air pollution. A $1 subsidy for monitors has infinite public value, from @rmetcalfe.bsky.social and Sefi Roth https://www.nber.org/papers/w33510
March 2, 2025 at 2:00 PM
Revealing real-time indoor air pollution cuts it by 17 percent overall, 34 percent when occupied. Lower-income households face worse indoor air pollution. A $1 subsidy for monitors has infinite public value, from @rmetcalfe.bsky.social and Sefi Roth https://www.nber.org/papers/w33510
"The large majority of survey respondents viewed the publication process as very inefficient
(38%) or somewhat inefficient (41%) ... Slightly more resp. saw the pub. process as somewhat or very meritocratic (41% & 8%) than as somewhat or very unmeritocratic (29% & 13%)"
res.org.uk/improving-th...
(38%) or somewhat inefficient (41%) ... Slightly more resp. saw the pub. process as somewhat or very meritocratic (41% & 8%) than as somewhat or very unmeritocratic (29% & 13%)"
res.org.uk/improving-th...
Improving the Publication Process in Economics - Royal Economic Society
The Royal Economic Society (RES) is pleased to share the report, “Improving the Publication Process in Economics”.
res.org.uk
February 25, 2025 at 6:08 PM
"The large majority of survey respondents viewed the publication process as very inefficient
(38%) or somewhat inefficient (41%) ... Slightly more resp. saw the pub. process as somewhat or very meritocratic (41% & 8%) than as somewhat or very unmeritocratic (29% & 13%)"
res.org.uk/improving-th...
(38%) or somewhat inefficient (41%) ... Slightly more resp. saw the pub. process as somewhat or very meritocratic (41% & 8%) than as somewhat or very unmeritocratic (29% & 13%)"
res.org.uk/improving-th...