The Hot American 🇺🇸
thehotamerican.bsky.social
The Hot American 🇺🇸
@thehotamerican.bsky.social
👁️ 🍠 🤬
👁️ 🍠 🇺🇸

Sic semper tyrannis.

Want money out of politics and to cure systemic racism, overnight?

Easy.

Conscription and sortition with ranked-choice voting: Crowd-source our leaders!

DOWN WITH THE REPUBLIC!
LONG LIVE DEMOCRACY!
Look the grammar nazi!
November 14, 2025 at 3:30 PM
For the past few days it has not been Trump writing these. IMO this is miller. It’s his syntax.
November 14, 2025 at 3:29 PM
Correct me if I’m wrong but at this point they can use deadly force to protect themselves, right?
November 14, 2025 at 3:09 PM
I’m still a bit lost on this. Code for he’s a criminal that didn’t bark??
November 13, 2025 at 9:57 PM
They can’t cancel us all.
November 13, 2025 at 8:08 PM
I’m not and I don’t. We’re speaking specifically whether the founding fathers themselves included all people when they stated “we the people” I’m not saying anything else. I believe my logic tracks when we analyze the semantics of “we the people” vs “we the free and accepted masons” or “free men”
November 13, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Demand name and badge number. Demand a warrant. If they do not provide one you can assume they are not LEO and can use whatever means necessary to save that person from unlawful kidnapping.
November 13, 2025 at 5:30 AM
And don’t pay your insurance company.
November 13, 2025 at 1:28 AM
IMO this is an intelligence operation from… massad, probably.
November 13, 2025 at 1:28 AM
If I do something to make someone else talk about it, I did my job.
November 13, 2025 at 1:25 AM
He didn’t write this.
November 13, 2025 at 1:24 AM
Something like “we, the free men,” But instead it is “we, the people,”specifically to include all people. “free” masons distinguished between free and enslaved. And because they did not distinguish with their words in the charter they must not have meant distinguish in their formation of government.
November 12, 2025 at 9:31 PM
“We the people” was understood to be all people. If the writers only intended free white men they would have said so. My reasoning is that since in their own practice, freedom was so very important for membership, then they would have distinguished themselves as separate in their charter as well.
November 12, 2025 at 9:31 PM
This is just one city. Philly and NYC also had black businesspeople. PA abolished slavery entirely by 1780. By 1790, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and Vermont had all become, through legislation or court decision, part of the First Emancipation.
November 12, 2025 at 9:31 PM
This is an article of black businesspeople in Boston during and before the revolutionary war. scholarworks.umb.edu/cgi/viewcont...
scholarworks.umb.edu
November 12, 2025 at 9:31 PM
That’s your line in the sand: inclusion? I stated that “we the people” meant all those with grievances (financial or otherwise) against the crown, and any black businesspeople would be included in that charter by that logic.
November 12, 2025 at 9:31 PM
Every state needs a voter initiate like Florida.
November 12, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Also you’ve seen my evidence you just don’t agree with it.
November 12, 2025 at 5:35 PM
You’re using other people’s interpretation of “we the people” not the founding fathers’ themselves. I think that’s a flaw in your argument. I do not see it as black and white as you do (no pun intended).
November 12, 2025 at 5:34 PM
My evidence are the nay votes, the writings and article 9.
November 12, 2025 at 5:12 PM