@theemightycage.bsky.social
Whataboutism isn't relevant here. I'm not arguing that legality and morality is always aligned, nice try though.
December 23, 2025 at 6:10 PM
Whataboutism isn't relevant here. I'm not arguing that legality and morality is always aligned, nice try though.
Do you always spend your time fantasizing about what pro-choice people might say/do?
December 22, 2025 at 7:24 PM
Do you always spend your time fantasizing about what pro-choice people might say/do?
I am able to understand their comment just fine, even with a couple typos. So, bad faith or poor reading comprehension--which is your excuse now?
December 22, 2025 at 4:24 AM
I am able to understand their comment just fine, even with a couple typos. So, bad faith or poor reading comprehension--which is your excuse now?
Considering I'm not the person you asked and misinterpreting authors of a post is a common problem for AI... It does seem even more likely now.
December 22, 2025 at 4:19 AM
Considering I'm not the person you asked and misinterpreting authors of a post is a common problem for AI... It does seem even more likely now.
The only way you wouldn't be able to understand that sentence from context clues is due to purposeful ignorance or.. being a bot.
December 22, 2025 at 4:14 AM
The only way you wouldn't be able to understand that sentence from context clues is due to purposeful ignorance or.. being a bot.
No, it's just common sense to protect the information of minors to Internet strangers. Especially the kind who are fine justifying ALL harm/trauma/harassment to women and kids if it means a baby is born.
December 22, 2025 at 4:02 AM
No, it's just common sense to protect the information of minors to Internet strangers. Especially the kind who are fine justifying ALL harm/trauma/harassment to women and kids if it means a baby is born.
You don't even know what my position is, so how can it have changed?
December 22, 2025 at 4:00 AM
You don't even know what my position is, so how can it have changed?
I asked what percentage of Medicaid dollars went to abortions, despite the Hyde Amendment forbidding it.
December 22, 2025 at 1:53 AM
I asked what percentage of Medicaid dollars went to abortions, despite the Hyde Amendment forbidding it.
No, I pointed out that your argument was in bad faith because the reasons why you say abortions are bad are almost never present. Then you tried to make your argument mine. My opinion on abortion is nothing that you've claimed thus far.
December 22, 2025 at 1:52 AM
No, I pointed out that your argument was in bad faith because the reasons why you say abortions are bad are almost never present. Then you tried to make your argument mine. My opinion on abortion is nothing that you've claimed thus far.
Yes, I volunteer with organizations that work to get kids adopted. If you had any knowledge of the field you'd know I'm not at liberty to discuss any information outside of vetted potential adopters.
December 22, 2025 at 1:51 AM
Yes, I volunteer with organizations that work to get kids adopted. If you had any knowledge of the field you'd know I'm not at liberty to discuss any information outside of vetted potential adopters.
Ironic to say "life saving" when those states had maternal and infant mortality more than triple.
December 21, 2025 at 11:23 PM
Ironic to say "life saving" when those states had maternal and infant mortality more than triple.
Weird. I know dozens of children personally waiting in the system to be adopted. All between four and six, so I find that to be suspicious.
December 21, 2025 at 11:20 PM
Weird. I know dozens of children personally waiting in the system to be adopted. All between four and six, so I find that to be suspicious.
Such bad faith arguments... Not that I'm surprised. No, my argument doesn't hinge on the presence of cardiac cells nor does the mainstream left position.
December 21, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Such bad faith arguments... Not that I'm surprised. No, my argument doesn't hinge on the presence of cardiac cells nor does the mainstream left position.
What percentage went to abortions vs other services? I assume you recognize the Hyde Amendment as well and why they receive funds in the first place. Specifically attacking those who can't afford healthcare is an interesting tactic.
December 21, 2025 at 11:11 PM
What percentage went to abortions vs other services? I assume you recognize the Hyde Amendment as well and why they receive funds in the first place. Specifically attacking those who can't afford healthcare is an interesting tactic.
Also, most of PPs money comes from private donations and goes to support women in ways that no other non-profit does.
December 21, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Also, most of PPs money comes from private donations and goes to support women in ways that no other non-profit does.
The "baby" at the time of the vast majority of terminations has none of the things you describe minus DNA. --And cellular life with unique DNA is quite a meaningless line to draw. We kill off cellular life ALL the time, from brain dead patients to embryos in a petri dish.
December 21, 2025 at 8:44 PM
The "baby" at the time of the vast majority of terminations has none of the things you describe minus DNA. --And cellular life with unique DNA is quite a meaningless line to draw. We kill off cellular life ALL the time, from brain dead patients to embryos in a petri dish.
Let me guess, they went to China because they would only adopt a newborn? The list is only long for "desirable" ages/children.
December 21, 2025 at 8:41 PM
Let me guess, they went to China because they would only adopt a newborn? The list is only long for "desirable" ages/children.
That is only true if you ignore the significant rise in self-managed abortions and the rise in neighboring states where it is legal. Overall, abortions have risen nationwide, meaning the legislation has had the exact opposite effect.
December 21, 2025 at 8:38 PM
That is only true if you ignore the significant rise in self-managed abortions and the rise in neighboring states where it is legal. Overall, abortions have risen nationwide, meaning the legislation has had the exact opposite effect.
Not in the legal sense, which is the only one that matters in such a debate.
December 21, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Not in the legal sense, which is the only one that matters in such a debate.
**literature not legislation
December 16, 2025 at 9:37 PM
**literature not legislation
I have never seen a single shred of evidence declaring that after implantation an embryo is 100% likely to survive to full-term gestation and delivery. In fact, I can point to many, many, pieces of legislation disproving that statement. Also, "literal" is not a variation of the definition.
December 16, 2025 at 9:36 PM
I have never seen a single shred of evidence declaring that after implantation an embryo is 100% likely to survive to full-term gestation and delivery. In fact, I can point to many, many, pieces of legislation disproving that statement. Also, "literal" is not a variation of the definition.
Murder in the legal or moral sense? Clearly not legal, since it isn't designated as such even in the most 'right' leaning states.
December 16, 2025 at 8:52 PM
Murder in the legal or moral sense? Clearly not legal, since it isn't designated as such even in the most 'right' leaning states.
So, blue states could do the same, and pump millions of dollars into arguing that nearly all weapons fall into the category based on a couple of vague requirements.
December 16, 2025 at 8:48 PM
So, blue states could do the same, and pump millions of dollars into arguing that nearly all weapons fall into the category based on a couple of vague requirements.
That would only work if the legislation was working with an exclusive, not inclusive, model. Red states have constantly armed the legislative arm with resources to argue that nearly anything that ends in fetal demise is in fact an abortion.
December 16, 2025 at 8:46 PM
That would only work if the legislation was working with an exclusive, not inclusive, model. Red states have constantly armed the legislative arm with resources to argue that nearly anything that ends in fetal demise is in fact an abortion.
Yeah, it's a brittle system that those around Trump want him to dismantle. Red States are trying every (likely unconstitutional) method to close the legality of mail-order pills, but I don't think they've accomplished much outside of overwhelming courts.
December 15, 2025 at 9:44 PM
Yeah, it's a brittle system that those around Trump want him to dismantle. Red States are trying every (likely unconstitutional) method to close the legality of mail-order pills, but I don't think they've accomplished much outside of overwhelming courts.