First trump, now this.
What a day /j

Yno this could be an interesting story to tell with 14 and Rose Noble given what seems like her new found vegan lifestyle

@josephlidster.bsky.social I could’ve taken care of him but you just hadddd to go and send him off with Luke to get robo freshers-flu /j

I’m fairly sure there’s a bit in the time traveller’s wife where he scolds her for making a move on him, like it’s literally stated that despite the circumstances of their relationship: this is not okay

Like I can absolutely understand why she idolises him in such a twisted way, the story itself is based on the time traveller’s wife, that’s exactly what happens there, I understand why that would mess her up. But that doesn’t mean it’s excusable.

Reason≠excuse and vice versa

If you are at the point where you are arguing to the contrary of what the writer to himself said.. maybe rethink your stance

The thing is, as a kid I never noticed how wrong it is, which is exactly the problem.
As much as Doctor Who isn’t the right show to tell those kind of stories front and centre, that doesn’t mean those connotations don’t apply to what was intended to be an innocent scene.

It’s bad.

Is this that scene with Amy? Even Moffat says he regrets writing that