2. Kirk
3. McCoy
4. LaForge
5. Paris
6. Spock
7. Worf
8. Hoshi
9. Mbenga
10. Hansen (aka Seven of Nine, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 01)
Many positions could be double- or triple-booked, but these are my #1s.
2. Kirk
3. McCoy
4. LaForge
5. Paris
6. Spock
7. Worf
8. Hoshi
9. Mbenga
10. Hansen (aka Seven of Nine, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 01)
Many positions could be double- or triple-booked, but these are my #1s.
It is between "this is obviously awkwardly staged" and "this could have happened naturally this way".
And in some instances, it is a question of a connecting element in the whole body of work present or not.
It is between "this is obviously awkwardly staged" and "this could have happened naturally this way".
And in some instances, it is a question of a connecting element in the whole body of work present or not.
There is some arguably pornographic material out there that is photographically exciting.
And for me the line is not between porn or not.
There is some arguably pornographic material out there that is photographically exciting.
And for me the line is not between porn or not.
On a serious note, I'd love to see some more elaborate info on your process, how you use light formers, which types of light for what position, raw camera image vs. edited (especially the exposure) - it is quite fascinating.
On a serious note, I'd love to see some more elaborate info on your process, how you use light formers, which types of light for what position, raw camera image vs. edited (especially the exposure) - it is quite fascinating.
"There are two hard things in computer science: naming things, and cache invalidation"
But seriously, names in my opinion form an important part of a piece of work.
"There are two hard things in computer science: naming things, and cache invalidation"
But seriously, names in my opinion form an important part of a piece of work.