@coachgowron.com

Only when Ken Jennings is on screen

Yes. The last judge SAID it doesn't apply in this instance, but they couldn't have RULED on that because it wasn't a live issue in that case. So if the DoJ wants to argue about the statute of limitations, they need to do it as part of a new case, rather than on appeal from the old one.

We just installed solar panels on our roof. So: You're welcome

Sounds like an old Germanic or Norse gremlin

It happens to my party a lot, just... only once all the monsters are already dead

I'm going with deep dish pizza

My dad is into genealogy. Apparently, our family originates from Alsace, France, where we had an ancestor named Jacques Bloch.

Every time someone accuses them of, for example, taking out Jamaal Bowman, they are helping AIPAC write an ad to take to its donors.

The story AIPAC doesn't want told is that Bowman was likely going down anyway, which is why AIPAC targeted him and not someone actually popular in their district.

And hey, you know who's really invested in making AIPAC seem really powerful, capable of making or breaking politicians at will?

AIPAC, of course.

That's how these lobbying groups make money. They have to convince people that they have power and connections. That's how they hook big donors.

Sorry, can you give an explanation for those of us who aren't great at Hebrew?

Why should I believe you? What are you actually doing to fight? How are you going to punish the members of your party who broke ranks?

I'm your constituent and I don't believe you. What are you going to do to punish the Dems who voted Yes?

Hmm

I'm glad you're feeling better but tbh I have no idea what you're even doing in this thread