Adam Morris
@thatadammorris.bsky.social
Computational cognitive scientist. Postdoc at Princeton. Studying introspection in humans and AI.
In other words, many high-level mental processes may not be *intrinsically* or permanently unconscious. Rather, people may be experiencing an internal analogue of inattentional blindness -- they fail to see what's going on in their mind because they're not paying attention.
May 28, 2025 at 3:40 PM
In other words, many high-level mental processes may not be *intrinsically* or permanently unconscious. Rather, people may be experiencing an internal analogue of inattentional blindness -- they fail to see what's going on in their mind because they're not paying attention.
Before the study, we asked decision scientists from SJDM to predict participants’ accuracy. Participants were *much* more accurate than these experts predicted; experts thought people would only show an r of 0.44. (Thanks to everyone at @sjdm-tweets.bsky.social bsky.social who participated!)
April 30, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Before the study, we asked decision scientists from SJDM to predict participants’ accuracy. Participants were *much* more accurate than these experts predicted; experts thought people would only show an r of 0.44. (Thanks to everyone at @sjdm-tweets.bsky.social bsky.social who participated!)
The main result: Participants’ self-reports were often highly correlated with their actual choice processes. For instance, in one study, participants had an average correlation of 0.8 between their self-reported attribute weights and the best-fit weights from the computational model.
April 30, 2025 at 2:16 PM
The main result: Participants’ self-reports were often highly correlated with their actual choice processes. For instance, in one study, participants had an average correlation of 0.8 between their self-reported attribute weights and the best-fit weights from the computational model.