Going after small victories like junk fee removal and other items required on rental agreements will not change the fact the giant landowners can sit on empty lots and buildings because the increase in value of the land is higher than their tax. We need to attack it there.

Yes. Advocacy for people with disabilities is now under direct threat due to Trump's addition of A to "DEIA". Surrender nobody.

Also, if you haven't yet, please think about donating $10 to my campaign. It goes a long way to helping me qualify for Democracy Vouchers, and actually being able to put these ideas into action.

More so the Light Rail expansion, less so the diatribe on Cars.

Ok, side rant over. Tying this up neatly, we are all human. We are not our cars, or our homes. We need to make sure the HUMANS can exist comfortably first. To do that, we need to start acting like our mass transit is our first option, and right now, the Light Rail is an afterthought.

That's without even covering the fact that those exact movies covered how being focused on perfect efficiency ruins important communities! THE MOVIE ABOUT LIVING CARS GIVES LESS PERMISSIONS TO THEIR CHARACTERS THAN WE DO TO TWO-TON HUNKS OF PLASTIC.

Every single station should take priority when building infrastructure ad infinitum. We want to build a city for people, not for cars. This isn't a mid-tier Disney trilogy, and we don't need to act like every single building that goes up needs a 1:1 ratio of beds to parking.

Basically every stop south of IAD seemingly forgets that it should use the Rail as its primary transit system, surrounded on both sides by cars. Seriously, who thought "Let's make sure the cars get more space than the train." in Othello?

We actually see this type of growth happening IN SPITE of these decisions. Northgate is becoming a wonderful hub even as it has the black eye of a 10 lane highway right next to it. However, we should just expect every Light Rail to instantly produce a hub, we need to cultivate it.

We want our rail stations to be ingrained within our community, not something people have to park at to use. In an attempt to get around the same zoning problems they created, Harrell and his ilk have continued to hamstring the largest positive points a Light Rail station can bring.

On a more fundamental level, and a piece may have picked up on, running the Light Rail by I-5 was always a poor decision, because it will always be compared to highway speed/traffic rather than as what it actually is; an hub of community and connection to the rest of the city.

This is honestly why Harrell's 'big news' for the West Seattle expansion being sped up by a year left me rolling my eyes. One year doesn't make a difference when the timeline is still measured in decades. I can't feign excitement when in that same amount of time we will see multiple new Presidents.

I will not claim to be able to write or explain this better than a legend of writing, so I'll leave it below. To sum it up though, just because you spend less once does not mean you spend less forever. That is exactly where our politics have ended us up; Buying shitty boots every year.

The most important part of all of this is expansion of the funding windows. SDOT has been very clear that the only thing really holding them up is that the city is only funding a percentage of what we could do in a year with proper resources. This leads us to Pratchett's "Boots Economic Theory.

The most recognizable problem is the GLACIAL pace of expansion. It took over a decade to get a Bellevue expansion, and is going to be another decade until we get the West Seattle expansion. When @theneedling.com is writing satire like this, you have to look at how to make it better.

It is no secret that I love the Light Rail. In fact, you can find me there every day going to and from work. The locations of the stops are (for the most part) in good places for getting to work by foot or taking a bus to/from a more specific place. So what's the problem(s)?

I tried to break this up into digestible pieces so the conversation can be focused in parts. I'll try to keep my posts here focused, but if you want to see me be much meaner to NIMBYs, follow my personal @thaddeusw.bsky.social

Be good to each other, and have a nice day.

Beyond just that basic cost, rent prices being high makes literally everything worse. Its a direct corollary, and it affects everybody. If you want your groceries to be cheaper, your streets safer, and your life to be less stressed, you should want rent prices to be as low as possible.

If you own a home now, great! You might see your annual raise in house worth go from 20 to 18%, but even that isn't guaranteed. What is a guarantee is that if we don't act on the insane cost of living now, you won't have any friends here to brag about your house price to.

Will every neighborhood get a new townhome/apartment complex? No, and that's fine! That's the whole point of making it city-wide, and not piecemeal. So lets stop acting like asking for an affordable place to live will immediately cause the end of Seattle.