Théotime Grohens
@tgrohens.bsky.social
Studying 🐭 🦷 development in silico in the Cigogne team at LBMC / ENS Lyon 🦁
Ex-CRG ☀️
Ex-INRIA Beagle 🐶 (now BioTiC)
Parisien professionnel ☔
he/him
Ex-CRG ☀️
Ex-INRIA Beagle 🐶 (now BioTiC)
Parisien professionnel ☔
he/him
Awesome video!!
November 21, 2025 at 12:10 PM
Awesome video!!
Reposted by Théotime Grohens
With this working, as a first test we took two plasmids, identical save for 8 point mutations changing the color, and competed them against one another. Here’s a video of what it looked like when we activated the recombinase. You can see the two compete in real time: 4/
November 20, 2025 at 9:42 PM
With this working, as a first test we took two plasmids, identical save for 8 point mutations changing the color, and competed them against one another. Here’s a video of what it looked like when we activated the recombinase. You can see the two compete in real time: 4/
super cool work!
November 18, 2025 at 9:42 AM
super cool work!
It's still a quantitative metric though.
November 13, 2025 at 7:20 PM
It's still a quantitative metric though.
Seems like the IRB hasn't signed it, though other members of the BIST have.
November 12, 2025 at 1:50 PM
Seems like the IRB hasn't signed it, though other members of the BIST have.
First recommendation of the DORA declaration:
1. Do not use journal-based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors, as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist’s contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions.
1. Do not use journal-based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors, as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist’s contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions.
November 12, 2025 at 1:49 PM
First recommendation of the DORA declaration:
1. Do not use journal-based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors, as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist’s contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions.
1. Do not use journal-based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors, as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist’s contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions.
Looks super interesting!! Is it open to the public?
November 3, 2025 at 10:13 AM
Looks super interesting!! Is it open to the public?
I agree, but to me the point of such a charter would be to say what we _ideally_ want and shoot for the moon! And (necessary) compromise comes only afterwards.
Looking at the data, in France we already have 12% less PhD students than 15 years ago: is what we want just the status quo?
Looking at the data, in France we already have 12% less PhD students than 15 years ago: is what we want just the status quo?
November 1, 2025 at 2:57 PM
I agree, but to me the point of such a charter would be to say what we _ideally_ want and shoot for the moon! And (necessary) compromise comes only afterwards.
Looking at the data, in France we already have 12% less PhD students than 15 years ago: is what we want just the status quo?
Looking at the data, in France we already have 12% less PhD students than 15 years ago: is what we want just the status quo?
Let me rephrase: even assuming it’s neither feasible nor desirable that all PhD graduates obtain an academic position, our platform still ought to be to fight for more positions rather than fewer students
October 31, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Let me rephrase: even assuming it’s neither feasible nor desirable that all PhD graduates obtain an academic position, our platform still ought to be to fight for more positions rather than fewer students