Tessa Gengnagel
banner
tesstess.bsky.social
Tessa Gengnagel
@tesstess.bsky.social
Postdoc, project manager @ CCeH. #DigitalHumanities. Digital scholarly editions. History, art history, film studies. Formerly co-host of Coding Codices, founding member of the Digital Medievalist Postgrad Committee.
oh dang, thank you! Happy to hear that this still resonates a few years on.
August 7, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Last thought: I wasn't sure whether to name Amadeus. It technically qualifies and it's one of the best films of any kind. But it's a total piece of character assassination re: Salieri; pop culture myth-making. On avg (quality vs historical value) it's part of the convo but probably not on balance.
February 22, 2024 at 3:53 PM
For sure. (I personally can't stand Depardieu but that's another matter.) Many films have good advisors, doesn't mean they implement advice. And then films may listen to advisors (e.g. The Northman) & still end up questionable from a historian's perspective for other reasons. It's a set of issues.
February 22, 2024 at 3:37 PM
I mean it really rather depends on what "best" film means in this context. Most accurate? Something like The Duellists ranks high in that regard. But it's difficult enough to find good pre-19th c. films to begin with, comparatively speaking and looking at the mainstream (historical = expensive).
February 22, 2024 at 2:34 PM
A Royal Affair (2012), Michael Kohlhaas (2013), Elizabeth (1998), Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000), Amadeus (1984), The Last of the Mohicans (1992), The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1939), The New World (2005), A Touch of Zen (1971), Barry Lyndon (1975), Wolf Hall (TV, 2015) + a few by Kurosawa...
February 22, 2024 at 2:18 PM
Thanks, I hope there will be something useful in it! There's plenty I didn't get to discuss and it still operates within a scope that's narrow in many ways (e.g. focus on 'works') but it's a step in one direction, so maybe some food for thought.
February 12, 2024 at 10:41 PM
Indeed 😂 Although the last 100 pages or so are just bibliography. But yes it's a long read, if read cover to cover, not gonna lie, it's why I inserted chapter abstracts. So it should make some sense no matter how it's perused.
February 12, 2024 at 7:38 PM
It's a very interdisciplinary work but chapter IV is focused on medieval materials (and they come up in other places as well). The main arguments build on each other; selective reading should be possible as well though, to some degree.
February 12, 2024 at 7:07 PM
Thanks, I hope it's as interesting as it sounds 😂
February 12, 2024 at 6:45 PM
Danke! 🤗
February 12, 2024 at 2:02 PM
I will, thanks!
November 19, 2023 at 2:08 PM
Oh that's amazing, good luck with those projects, I'm excited to follow along for updates!
November 18, 2023 at 8:33 PM
Thanks! I'm doing alright, finally getting the mandatory publication of my thesis off my back in January. How have you been? Hope you've been well! I keep thinking that I need to catch up on your writing!
November 18, 2023 at 6:50 PM