terrypearson.bsky.social
@terrypearson.bsky.social
👍It is good to see it promoted though. There's often talk of one or the other on X.
November 25, 2025 at 4:46 PM
I think it has something to do with the 12 days of Xmas carol/nursery rhyme.
November 25, 2025 at 11:39 AM
Isn't the tradition to put up the tree 12 days before Xmas day and take it down 12 days after?
November 25, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Thanks for making time to share the link and produce the thread. You might find the article on the link below interesting: eric.ed.gov?id=ED544189
ERIC - ED544189 - Instructional Practices and Student Math Achievement: Correlations from a Study of Math Curricula. NCEE Evaluation Brief. NCEE 2013-4020, National Center for Education Evaluation and...
This brief is directed to researchers and adds to the research base about instructional practices that are related to student achievement. Additional evidence on these relationships can suggest specif...
eric.ed.gov
November 25, 2025 at 10:59 AM
Reposted
I would like to see open-access publishing requirements that don't force researchers to shovel millions in research funds to publishers for gold open access. We can make our research open-access in ways that are completely free.
June 3, 2025 at 10:17 AM
👍
May 24, 2025 at 11:21 AM
Sure. Thankfully not all do. But when it happens it can lead to popular, but lop-sided understandings of what research has reported about particular topics. See the Open Access piece on this link which highlights one example: www.researchgate.net/publication/...
(PDF) Taking a nuanced view of retrieval practice research: Retrieval-induced forgetting as a starting point.
PDF | This is an author’s copy of the journal article. Please use the citation provided. | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
www.researchgate.net
May 24, 2025 at 9:52 AM
It seems so according to the title of the video Darren. My point is a general one really. Some researchers are keen to dismiss findings that don't fit with popular (and sometimes their own) views.
May 24, 2025 at 8:36 AM
Its is always wise to respect, and not ignore, outliers; especially when considering research in education!
May 23, 2025 at 7:49 PM
We have known for a while that general statements such as “knowledge is power” are misleading. The study on this link calls for systematic research on the conditions under which prior knowledge has positive, negative, or negligible effects on learning.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning: A meta-analysis
It is often hypothesized that prior knowledge strongly predicts learning performance. It can affect learning positively mediated through some processes and negatively mediated through others. We ex...
www.tandfonline.com
May 22, 2025 at 3:15 PM
I don't think the results of the paper should be seen as out of the ordinary. Ed. res. often produces mixed results. It reinforces the need to be wary of absolute claims of effectiveness and to be willing to embrace nuance. As wise researchers know, sometimes things go to plan sometimes they don't
May 22, 2025 at 2:46 PM