Terry Bergen
@terrybergen.bsky.social
Husband. Father. Wannabe cyclist, paddler & skier on Vancouver Island.
Born @ 330ppm.
“Try not to punch down.”
Born @ 330ppm.
“Try not to punch down.”
So embarrassing @cbseveningnews.bsky.social.
That’s an interesting alternate headline to “Multiple bankrupt waxes incoherently on economic policy.”
That’s an interesting alternate headline to “Multiple bankrupt waxes incoherently on economic policy.”
December 5, 2025 at 4:44 AM
So embarrassing @cbseveningnews.bsky.social.
That’s an interesting alternate headline to “Multiple bankrupt waxes incoherently on economic policy.”
That’s an interesting alternate headline to “Multiple bankrupt waxes incoherently on economic policy.”
Sigh... my hometown.
December 3, 2025 at 6:40 AM
Sigh... my hometown.
Echoing others... "the cowardice rule".
December 2, 2025 at 11:03 PM
Echoing others... "the cowardice rule".
Essentially a government bailout, albeit via inaction, but a bailout nonetheless.
Communism for businesses evidently still totally fine in the USA.
Communism for businesses evidently still totally fine in the USA.
November 25, 2025 at 1:32 AM
Essentially a government bailout, albeit via inaction, but a bailout nonetheless.
Communism for businesses evidently still totally fine in the USA.
Communism for businesses evidently still totally fine in the USA.
Reposted by Terry Bergen
BBC decided to cancel a podcast on heat pumps deeming the topic "controversial" because it presented that the technology could contribute to net zero reducing carbon emmissions.
In 2025 an anti-science posture is not only valid, but required in any debate to be considered "balanced" 😬
In 2025 an anti-science posture is not only valid, but required in any debate to be considered "balanced" 😬
October 10, 2025 at 11:09 AM
BBC decided to cancel a podcast on heat pumps deeming the topic "controversial" because it presented that the technology could contribute to net zero reducing carbon emmissions.
In 2025 an anti-science posture is not only valid, but required in any debate to be considered "balanced" 😬
In 2025 an anti-science posture is not only valid, but required in any debate to be considered "balanced" 😬