Incredible ability to ship!
January 18, 2025 at 10:29 PM
Incredible ability to ship!
At least not in the way that would transfer to having nothing to contribute to political discourse
January 18, 2025 at 9:01 PM
At least not in the way that would transfer to having nothing to contribute to political discourse
Not to be tongue-in-cheek, but I really don’t think having a well researched but fringe (even totally wrong) outlook on the identity of Shakespeare is intellectually damning
January 18, 2025 at 9:00 PM
Not to be tongue-in-cheek, but I really don’t think having a well researched but fringe (even totally wrong) outlook on the identity of Shakespeare is intellectually damning
Couldn’t this just be a left critique of anything that’s not on the left
You also hear this about neoliberalism, or fusionism, or libertarianism, or
You also hear this about neoliberalism, or fusionism, or libertarianism, or
January 18, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Couldn’t this just be a left critique of anything that’s not on the left
You also hear this about neoliberalism, or fusionism, or libertarianism, or
You also hear this about neoliberalism, or fusionism, or libertarianism, or
You’re well read and enjoy a back-and-forth
Why not email him challenging questions and post the results?
Why not email him challenging questions and post the results?
January 18, 2025 at 4:30 PM
You’re well read and enjoy a back-and-forth
Why not email him challenging questions and post the results?
Why not email him challenging questions and post the results?
I keep asking this and not getting a good answer
If he’s a pseudointellectual, why do his critics and interviewers fail? Lack of resources?
If he’s a pseudointellectual, why do his critics and interviewers fail? Lack of resources?
January 18, 2025 at 4:29 PM
I keep asking this and not getting a good answer
If he’s a pseudointellectual, why do his critics and interviewers fail? Lack of resources?
If he’s a pseudointellectual, why do his critics and interviewers fail? Lack of resources?
If he’s so simple why does the interviewer fumble
I keep seeing this claim, but the more coverage we see that falls short, the more it just looks like laziness
I keep seeing this claim, but the more coverage we see that falls short, the more it just looks like laziness
January 18, 2025 at 4:02 PM
If he’s so simple why does the interviewer fumble
I keep seeing this claim, but the more coverage we see that falls short, the more it just looks like laziness
I keep seeing this claim, but the more coverage we see that falls short, the more it just looks like laziness
It would be great if someone with some background in history could actually do the interview
This interviewer said it literally “made his head hurt”
This interviewer said it literally “made his head hurt”
January 18, 2025 at 3:17 PM
It would be great if someone with some background in history could actually do the interview
This interviewer said it literally “made his head hurt”
This interviewer said it literally “made his head hurt”
I literally said it right here
January 18, 2025 at 3:13 PM
I literally said it right here
I just said I don’t like his writing and don’t agree with him
The coverage is still garbage
The coverage is still garbage
January 18, 2025 at 3:11 PM
I just said I don’t like his writing and don’t agree with him
The coverage is still garbage
The coverage is still garbage
You’re a pretty in-depth researcher, grok the online world, and don’t mind taking swings
Maybe this is a Liz spiers piece
Maybe this is a Liz spiers piece
January 18, 2025 at 3:09 PM
You’re a pretty in-depth researcher, grok the online world, and don’t mind taking swings
Maybe this is a Liz spiers piece
Maybe this is a Liz spiers piece
And it seems like everyone is saying the coverage is bad
January 18, 2025 at 3:07 PM
And it seems like everyone is saying the coverage is bad
Where do I endorse any of his ideas
I’m just saying the coverage is bad
I’m just saying the coverage is bad
January 18, 2025 at 3:07 PM
Where do I endorse any of his ideas
I’m just saying the coverage is bad
I’m just saying the coverage is bad
I’m not really a fan, the tone is pompous and I disagree with the conclusions
It’s just grating to see piece after piece claim to take him to task and “shine a light” and skip the step of challenging anything
It’s just grating to see piece after piece claim to take him to task and “shine a light” and skip the step of challenging anything
January 18, 2025 at 3:00 PM
I’m not really a fan, the tone is pompous and I disagree with the conclusions
It’s just grating to see piece after piece claim to take him to task and “shine a light” and skip the step of challenging anything
It’s just grating to see piece after piece claim to take him to task and “shine a light” and skip the step of challenging anything
That would be great! I’m not surprised that editors were too skeptical to devote resources at first, but you’d think that by now someone with the demeanor you mention would take up the task
It’d be great to see a well researched challenging interview!
It’d be great to see a well researched challenging interview!
January 18, 2025 at 2:57 PM
That would be great! I’m not surprised that editors were too skeptical to devote resources at first, but you’d think that by now someone with the demeanor you mention would take up the task
It’d be great to see a well researched challenging interview!
It’d be great to see a well researched challenging interview!
This seems like it’s dancing around a bit. If he’s gormless then why does the interviewer struggle? If he’s ineffectual why are there a dozen glossy exposés about him “giving Vance his ideas” as Americas “most controversial political theorist?”
I’m willing to accept its sensationalism
I’m willing to accept its sensationalism
January 18, 2025 at 2:51 PM
This seems like it’s dancing around a bit. If he’s gormless then why does the interviewer struggle? If he’s ineffectual why are there a dozen glossy exposés about him “giving Vance his ideas” as Americas “most controversial political theorist?”
I’m willing to accept its sensationalism
I’m willing to accept its sensationalism
That’s fair! But it seems like a different argument than him being a waste of time, and might rely on a lack of confidence in readers
January 18, 2025 at 2:39 PM
That’s fair! But it seems like a different argument than him being a waste of time, and might rely on a lack of confidence in readers
So he’s not a shadowy figure influencing elected officials and the donor class?
January 18, 2025 at 2:34 PM
So he’s not a shadowy figure influencing elected officials and the donor class?
You’d think with all of these accusations of being a shallow thinker, someone would be able to demonstrate that in a challenging interview
January 18, 2025 at 2:33 PM
You’d think with all of these accusations of being a shallow thinker, someone would be able to demonstrate that in a challenging interview
Because the interviewer embarrassed himself or because nyt readers are incapable of evaluating what’s being said?
January 18, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Because the interviewer embarrassed himself or because nyt readers are incapable of evaluating what’s being said?
The interviewer totally lost his composure
To whatever extent Yarvin is a pseudointellectual, his interviewer fails at demonstrating that
To whatever extent Yarvin is a pseudointellectual, his interviewer fails at demonstrating that
January 18, 2025 at 2:29 PM
The interviewer totally lost his composure
To whatever extent Yarvin is a pseudointellectual, his interviewer fails at demonstrating that
To whatever extent Yarvin is a pseudointellectual, his interviewer fails at demonstrating that
He’s probably the most accessible billionaire
You can tweet at him and there’s a better chance he’ll reply than your odds with the average nyt journalist
You can tweet at him and there’s a better chance he’ll reply than your odds with the average nyt journalist
January 18, 2025 at 1:46 AM
He’s probably the most accessible billionaire
You can tweet at him and there’s a better chance he’ll reply than your odds with the average nyt journalist
You can tweet at him and there’s a better chance he’ll reply than your odds with the average nyt journalist