Jannik
@teraku.de
He/Him
🧗🏼Climber on hiatus
⛵️Now sailing, swimming and gym
📖 Reading SF, Classics, Non-Fiction, and much more
🍵 Coffee and tea lover
Software and data person.
Always thinking about things.
🧗🏼Climber on hiatus
⛵️Now sailing, swimming and gym
📖 Reading SF, Classics, Non-Fiction, and much more
🍵 Coffee and tea lover
Software and data person.
Always thinking about things.
Ja das finde ich auch, aber ich würde es nicht als etwas gänzlich drittes bezeichnen
April 27, 2025 at 7:01 AM
Ja das finde ich auch, aber ich würde es nicht als etwas gänzlich drittes bezeichnen
Bin ich dumm oder ist ein bag of heuristic nicht in etwa ein stochastic parrot?
April 27, 2025 at 6:44 AM
Bin ich dumm oder ist ein bag of heuristic nicht in etwa ein stochastic parrot?
Something like this:
Participants took more steps on coffee days (10,646 steps) than caffeine avoidance days (9665 steps). However, caffeine also led to less sleep (36 fewer minutes per night) and more daily premature ventricular contractions (p < 0.05).
www.strongerbyscience.com/pros-cons-ca...
Participants took more steps on coffee days (10,646 steps) than caffeine avoidance days (9665 steps). However, caffeine also led to less sleep (36 fewer minutes per night) and more daily premature ventricular contractions (p < 0.05).
www.strongerbyscience.com/pros-cons-ca...
The Pros and Cons of Caffeine
Caffeine can give a boost of energy and acutely improve performance, but concerns about potential downsides (such as sleep disruption or heart issues) are common. This article discusses both the pros ...
www.strongerbyscience.com
April 13, 2025 at 6:59 AM
Something like this:
Participants took more steps on coffee days (10,646 steps) than caffeine avoidance days (9665 steps). However, caffeine also led to less sleep (36 fewer minutes per night) and more daily premature ventricular contractions (p < 0.05).
www.strongerbyscience.com/pros-cons-ca...
Participants took more steps on coffee days (10,646 steps) than caffeine avoidance days (9665 steps). However, caffeine also led to less sleep (36 fewer minutes per night) and more daily premature ventricular contractions (p < 0.05).
www.strongerbyscience.com/pros-cons-ca...
Maybe? If I remember correctly SBS dug out research saying it‘s inconclusive but their take was it‘s primarily due to more Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) from the caffeine. But that is just speculation
April 13, 2025 at 6:57 AM
Maybe? If I remember correctly SBS dug out research saying it‘s inconclusive but their take was it‘s primarily due to more Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) from the caffeine. But that is just speculation
Reposted by Jannik
As far as I’ve read it’s not, but it inhibits your gut from absorbing micro nutrients so maybe that’s related.
April 13, 2025 at 6:31 AM
As far as I’ve read it’s not, but it inhibits your gut from absorbing micro nutrients so maybe that’s related.
Related: cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog...
Kevin Beaumont (@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social)
Attached: 1 image
Potential first major red flag that the AI bubble is going to burst - Microsoft are cancelling opex they'd committed for AI https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-24/micros...
cyberplace.social
February 25, 2025 at 6:39 AM
Related: cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog...
Fand das letzte Video von Gary dazu nochmal sehr aufschlussreich aber habe dann auch nochmal in Debt gestöbert und it‘s a struggle that dates back more than 3000 years
February 18, 2025 at 9:12 PM
Fand das letzte Video von Gary dazu nochmal sehr aufschlussreich aber habe dann auch nochmal in Debt gestöbert und it‘s a struggle that dates back more than 3000 years
> Put simply, a significant share of the US’s “booming” economy is generated by sickness. Inefficiencies in its healthcare system may also prop up US GDP by sustaining high levels of costly healthcare-related expenditure.
Source: Financial Times
Source: Financial Times
February 8, 2025 at 5:19 PM
> Put simply, a significant share of the US’s “booming” economy is generated by sickness. Inefficiencies in its healthcare system may also prop up US GDP by sustaining high levels of costly healthcare-related expenditure.
Source: Financial Times
Source: Financial Times
> As for employment, more than 40 per cent of new private sector jobs created since the start of 2023 have been in healthcare. The biggest US industries by revenue include hospitals, drug wholesalers and medical insurers.
February 8, 2025 at 5:18 PM
> As for employment, more than 40 per cent of new private sector jobs created since the start of 2023 have been in healthcare. The biggest US industries by revenue include hospitals, drug wholesalers and medical insurers.
> Yet the country has among the worst health outcomes. Americans are more likely to die younger, have multiple chronic conditions, and die from a preventable or treatable malady, relative to citizens in other rich nations.
February 8, 2025 at 5:18 PM
> Yet the country has among the worst health outcomes. Americans are more likely to die younger, have multiple chronic conditions, and die from a preventable or treatable malady, relative to citizens in other rich nations.
> Close to a fifth of US GDP comes from health expenditure. That is well above other OECD nations (in per capita terms too). Yet the country has among the worst health outcomes.
February 8, 2025 at 5:18 PM
> Close to a fifth of US GDP comes from health expenditure. That is well above other OECD nations (in per capita terms too). Yet the country has among the worst health outcomes.
Ist das nicht das gleiche wie der vorige Tweet (bsky.app/profile/geri...)? Sofern man das kanalisieren als Vermögenssteuer mit anschließender Entlastung interpretiert
Die linksliberale Lösung ist: die Geldflut aus dem stehenden Assetmarkt hin in produktive Investitionen zu kanalisieren. Das wäre okay, aber die Renditeerwartung von 9% trägt der Konsument und die Erlöse fließen zurück in den Pool ökonomischen Machtpotenzials.
February 2, 2025 at 8:37 AM
Ist das nicht das gleiche wie der vorige Tweet (bsky.app/profile/geri...)? Sofern man das kanalisieren als Vermögenssteuer mit anschließender Entlastung interpretiert
^ objectively fine not meaning I agree with it, but in the sense that they cover all the things „center right“ people complain about already
January 29, 2025 at 9:46 PM
^ objectively fine not meaning I agree with it, but in the sense that they cover all the things „center right“ people complain about already
Conservatives allied with the Nazis and liberals to tighten border laws that were objectively fine. The previous laws were already not enforced because of understaffed customs and police. And who is responsible for the lack of money? Conservatives and liberals
January 29, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Conservatives allied with the Nazis and liberals to tighten border laws that were objectively fine. The previous laws were already not enforced because of understaffed customs and police. And who is responsible for the lack of money? Conservatives and liberals
Keine Sorge, dass gibt es auch international. Alles schon erlebt 😞
January 16, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Keine Sorge, dass gibt es auch international. Alles schon erlebt 😞