Difficult to argue against

As @transitionsnetwork.bsky.social continues to thrive, EIST will hopefully do the same. We will be waiting for your high-quality papers on sustainability transitions!

www.sciencedirect.com/journal/envi...

I will do my best to continue to strengthen EIST, in collaboration with the brilliant colleagues on the editorial board. EIST is first of all a central part of the infrastructure of the sustainability transitions research community.

Theoretically, the paper adds a geographical dimension to the (otherwise) quite aspatial literature on transition pathways.
W @bardhaugland.bsky.social @markussteen.bsky.social & Nils Oskar Tronrud.

We analyse the feasibility of implementing CCS, including how this varies significantly across different plants. Core policy implication: investment support for CCS in waste-to-energy should not be reserved exclusively for pioneer projects, as there are limits to learning across plants.

@ad-andersen.bsky.social @kfrenken.bsky.social

As expected, producing and distributing enough low-carbon electricity is considered a key challenge. But there are also notable differences between the two countries; for example, Norwegian participants are more skeptical towards the possibility of reaching climate goals.

We demonstrate how changes over time in scalar orientation of policy rationales in Norway have influenced legitimacy for three technologies: LNG in shipping, offshore wind, and CCS

Do policies have a scalar orientation? Yes they do! And it matters for whether specific technologies are deemed as relevant for receiving support. We develop a novel framework depending on the focus on domestic/global challenges and whether domestic/global policy effects are prioritised