If you've moderated a server before, preferably still active in moderation, please let me know! Please spread this thread (preferably via the very first post in the thread) so more people will know about this.

I'll send an invite link to anyone I trust enough.

However, I do NEED some help with setting things up. From the rules to the general structure of this server. I am very much not finished as I had just started creating it yesterday.

Also, anyone who joins cannot see any channel aside from a few unless they have verified that they're an adult.

The server will be inclusive by design, although my 4chan-adjacent vocabulary will seep through so I must warn you.

I want a server where ecchi/fanservice enthusiasts can enjoy what they're talking about without being discriminated over race or sexuality, or being alienated by culture-war toxicity.

Just reading its definition alone is proof that the word is engineered for easy fearmongering.

"The unlawful use of violence to achieve ideological goals."

That means if you kill an evil CEO, resist against Israeli war crimes, or are in the Black Panther Party. That's now makes you a terrorist.

Ironically enough, the people who seriously say "she looks young, but she's actually a legal adult, trust me bro." are usually people who jerk off to characters like Tatsumaki but are afraid of being called a lolicon so they gotta do some revisionism to appeal to normies who won't like them anyways.

Nobody is actually dumb enough to unironically say "she's actually a 500-year-old demon" and expect the public to believe them. Even when used as a legitimate argument, it's usually to make the point that anime/manga doesn't take a fictional cartoon character's age seriously and neither should you.

remember back when people call a game simply bad and review bomb it just for having microtransactions or lootboxes without needing to care if the game is actually good or not? I wish people have the balls to do that more often nowadays so companies can finally know they should fucking stop.

Silver Surfer isn't even that hard, it's just that people are salty that a shoot-em-up designed to shoot by each button press can't let you aimlessly shoot just by holding it.

Save states and rewind features are a blight on retro rereleases.

They should AT LEAST be unlockables for beating the game legitimately, or preferably removed altogether because they only exist as a crutch for normies. The only progress that should be saved are games with in-game save data.

calling a game bad for having slowdown or "outdated" mechanics when they were the result of hardware limitations, etc.

Context is key when it comes to these type of games. They were meant to be played in short bursts, and only few of them (like most JRPGs) let you actually save your progress.

People tend to have terrible critiques of old games

Playing blind without reading a manual booklet as games back then don't have the space to explain every minuscule mechanic, complaining about the difficulty being unforgiving when the game is designed to be that way to make up for low space,

hiiii, I like to occasionally play puyo as well.

it’s not even worth being on the pirate bay

he looks like a combination between nick fuentes and tucker carlson

don’t let bad actors ruin what you liked. we know you’re a nice person.

personally I think you should just take a long break from drawing that stuff if you currently feel uncomfortable about it.