empathize with when Proudhon said he wanted a society where he would be executed as a conservative.

I'm the furthest left thing in my community, I think, and I want a society where I am far behind on the times by comparison.

This one is a really obvious moral choice, but I kinda look forward to the moral choices that we haven't considered yet but future people have. I want to hear them so I can implement them ahead of time kinda selfishly, but also because I want the sense of society improving.

I hate him, but I kinda

loyalty at worst.

That is all.

interactive activities that are separate from government or from labor, then it is all but guaranteed that a communist society would need these things as well in order to function. Anything outside of this idea is idealism at best or a reactionary rejection of fact in favor of blind ideological

life.

Entertainment, unrelated to one's daily events and activities and unrelated to one's government, will have to exist for a society to possibly function. This was the purpose of the original board games and sports going back thousands of years. If every single society has some sort of games or

child. We should not lie to them or construct an entirely separate society for them as we do now, but we should start slow and slowly bring them into the real world at an adjustable but moderate pace. By the age of 25, one should be fully immersed in the world with the real possibility of a stable

to not terrorize and traumatize children. The issue we see today with eldest children with siblings is that being forced to grow up too fast is detrimental to brain development, and getting rid of all children's media and forcing them to interact with only the real world does just this, but to every

opportunities provided by the state would allow it to supercede Nintendo and avoid the toxic traits inherited to Nintendo by its situation in a post-capitalist market system.

As for children's media, this is necessary in every society, with some degree of separation from the mature world, in order

Nintendo, outside of being a video game creator, currently plays a pivotal role in children's media due to the current lack of interactive public alternatives. The corporation behind it gives it more legitimacy and recognition than any possible start-up alternative, however one with the power and

entertainment possibilities (or even possible propagandistic potential), you would need to construct an alternative which is not too aggressively ideological otherwise a consumer base will not form around it except for already established party supporters.

and the inherently capitalist marketing and corporate choices of gaming companies which are to be abolished, not the concept of interactive video media itself. Even if you were to illegalize every video game which currently exists, in order to receive the possible educational benefits and

topics in a way that allows them to dismantle and reassemble until they understand said thing.

Video games themselves are not the problems that one is trying to abolish as a member of the communist movement. It is the toxic nature of the reactionary undercurrent present within gaming communities

and an association of their currently negatives traits, which result so from its situation within a capitalist society, as inherently bourgeois and "degenerating".

Video games provide an interactive medium by which tactile, visual, and kinesthetic learners can engage with concepts and complex

But they will drop their commission (if there is one) to 5% instead of 30. I believe there still would be one because you have to use funds to manage servers

Orthodox Marxists in the Departments and Committees. Thank you"

And to note, the Soviet Union had flaws, yes... But I'd prefer it to whatever is currently in the cards. This thing... whatever is coming from the right... is going to make the historical genocides and the ones happening now look like kindergarteners on the playground if it wins due to sheer scale.