Absolutely not. I feel like you trying to say that murder of a women should be legal because she had an abortion? An abortion which removes a clump of cells that have yet to form nerves? That haven’t formed ANYTHING? Get a grip.

What was the women’s choice? Let me know what could have possibly pushed her to have an abortion if not for the reasons; she didn’t want kids, she couldn’t take care of them, or it was r@p3. The women’s choice will always be valid. If you want a child, you need to talk about it and agree.

If you care oh so much about babies lives; have you adopted? Have you worked for daycares? Have you donated to orphanages? Have you donated to organizations to help homeless and starving children? Let me know what you have done to help the already suffering children of the world.

Fetuses aren’t children. And most cases of women “killing” children are either because of r@p3 or because they physically could not take care of it. Brining up the men killing women thing wasn’t necessary or relevant, but you wanted something “scary” or “triggering” to prove your point.

Women’s reproductive rights should never come to a vote. Men who respect women would know that, and vote for the women’s choice. I don’t know if you know much about respecting women.

Men who respect women don’t call women whores. They don’t degrade women. Men who respect women vote for someone who is on both men and women’s side, not just men’s.