Tom Arnold
@tarnold85.bsky.social
In which way does the headline lie?
May 21, 2025 at 3:06 PM
In which way does the headline lie?
You do have a sense of humour. That requires an ability for lateral thinking, there is hope for you yet.👍
April 30, 2025 at 8:16 PM
You do have a sense of humour. That requires an ability for lateral thinking, there is hope for you yet.👍
I understand that you live in world where everyone who disagrees with you must be evil because you don’t want to engage with nuance and context. I’m sure that in your friendship group your arguments are very persuasive but sadly your approach to this debate has been quite ignorant.
April 30, 2025 at 8:15 PM
I understand that you live in world where everyone who disagrees with you must be evil because you don’t want to engage with nuance and context. I’m sure that in your friendship group your arguments are very persuasive but sadly your approach to this debate has been quite ignorant.
This started as a discussion about the wrongs of encouraging political violence which, as you have been quiet on, I can only assume support?
Find a quote from me that claims no Conservative lied during the pandemic and you may have a point. You can’t and you don’t. Stick to student politics
Find a quote from me that claims no Conservative lied during the pandemic and you may have a point. You can’t and you don’t. Stick to student politics
April 30, 2025 at 8:15 PM
This started as a discussion about the wrongs of encouraging political violence which, as you have been quiet on, I can only assume support?
Find a quote from me that claims no Conservative lied during the pandemic and you may have a point. You can’t and you don’t. Stick to student politics
Find a quote from me that claims no Conservative lied during the pandemic and you may have a point. You can’t and you don’t. Stick to student politics
Is your switching of the argument your way of saying I was right? If so cheers. Also ignored the more substantive point which tells me all I need to know about the level of your engagement. Keep shouting in that echo chamber chum, you’ll go far.
April 30, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Is your switching of the argument your way of saying I was right? If so cheers. Also ignored the more substantive point which tells me all I need to know about the level of your engagement. Keep shouting in that echo chamber chum, you’ll go far.
I appreciate the grammatical tip but it doesn’t change the fact that Tory’s is not correct when referring purely the group as a plural without possession.
On your second point, I agree he did lie. I also don’t believe that every Conservative should be held to account for that lie.
On your second point, I agree he did lie. I also don’t believe that every Conservative should be held to account for that lie.
April 30, 2025 at 7:20 PM
I appreciate the grammatical tip but it doesn’t change the fact that Tory’s is not correct when referring purely the group as a plural without possession.
On your second point, I agree he did lie. I also don’t believe that every Conservative should be held to account for that lie.
On your second point, I agree he did lie. I also don’t believe that every Conservative should be held to account for that lie.
Which fact did I ignore? I simply said that it isn’t clever to suggest an entire group is guilty for the actions of some. I also pointed out that the Labour Party supported all the measures the Conservatives suggested. You don’t want to engage with fact chap, or the English language it seems.
April 30, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Which fact did I ignore? I simply said that it isn’t clever to suggest an entire group is guilty for the actions of some. I also pointed out that the Labour Party supported all the measures the Conservatives suggested. You don’t want to engage with fact chap, or the English language it seems.
If you can’t set the physical threat in what Kneecap said then you really do lack even a primary school level education and this discussion is probably not worth having.
April 30, 2025 at 1:02 PM
If you can’t set the physical threat in what Kneecap said then you really do lack even a primary school level education and this discussion is probably not worth having.
It’s Tories not Tory’s. Every Tory lied did they, did no other political party agree with the lockdown approach. You need to understand that politics isn’t about ignorantly shouting at an entire group and recognising the individuals within them.
April 30, 2025 at 1:01 PM
It’s Tories not Tory’s. Every Tory lied did they, did no other political party agree with the lockdown approach. You need to understand that politics isn’t about ignorantly shouting at an entire group and recognising the individuals within them.
You need lessons in the use of the apostrophe as well as educating as to the way politics works. You highlight perfectly why the self-obsession and entitlement of today requires us to have a specific law proscribing physical threats against MPs.
April 30, 2025 at 11:54 AM
You need lessons in the use of the apostrophe as well as educating as to the way politics works. You highlight perfectly why the self-obsession and entitlement of today requires us to have a specific law proscribing physical threats against MPs.
Fair enough, still don’t see why that meant you had to fling abuse my way. You inferred a particular opinion that I hold without finding out what it is. Since you don’t want to know probably best leave it there.👍
April 17, 2025 at 7:00 AM
Fair enough, still don’t see why that meant you had to fling abuse my way. You inferred a particular opinion that I hold without finding out what it is. Since you don’t want to know probably best leave it there.👍
Yeah and some other things. I have never once denied the rights of others yet you throw that term at me. I get it, you don’t want to engage with debate, you want to sling mud because it makes you feel better. Carey on, see how much changes.
April 17, 2025 at 6:54 AM
Yeah and some other things. I have never once denied the rights of others yet you throw that term at me. I get it, you don’t want to engage with debate, you want to sling mud because it makes you feel better. Carey on, see how much changes.
Your method of argument is the reason why bigots don’t engage. You have proven yourself to be decisive. Keep shouting abuse at people it works so well and you go to bed at night what a great person you are having helped nobody.
April 17, 2025 at 6:50 AM
Your method of argument is the reason why bigots don’t engage. You have proven yourself to be decisive. Keep shouting abuse at people it works so well and you go to bed at night what a great person you are having helped nobody.
What is my opinion. I’ve expressed a view on the legalities of the case. It is simple minded people who then project opinion without asking. People like you are the reason transpeople face daily abuse, amend your, engage in debate or achieve nothing.
April 17, 2025 at 6:43 AM
What is my opinion. I’ve expressed a view on the legalities of the case. It is simple minded people who then project opinion without asking. People like you are the reason transpeople face daily abuse, amend your, engage in debate or achieve nothing.
People who debate by photograph often fail to understand the words within them. You clearly don’t know what a fascist is. I’ve never denied trans people should be protected only that people should understand the legal basis of this ruling. You benefit from listening more and shouting less.
April 17, 2025 at 6:41 AM
People who debate by photograph often fail to understand the words within them. You clearly don’t know what a fascist is. I’ve never denied trans people should be protected only that people should understand the legal basis of this ruling. You benefit from listening more and shouting less.
I simply come back to what I have said before. This issue is so much at the edge of the argument that is doesn’t help women (trans or otherwise). I’ve never been interested in arguments at the extreme so I think we had best leave it.👍
April 16, 2025 at 2:49 PM
I simply come back to what I have said before. This issue is so much at the edge of the argument that is doesn’t help women (trans or otherwise). I’ve never been interested in arguments at the extreme so I think we had best leave it.👍
Your vacuous approach will change nothing. You spread as much hate as those who deny trans issues even exist.
April 16, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Your vacuous approach will change nothing. You spread as much hate as those who deny trans issues even exist.
I’ve argued legal fact which you have sought to entirely ignore. I believe in dealing with issues as they are, not jumping on the bandwagon and using hysterical inferences which do nothing to advance the cause. I understand that to change you have to talk with people who don’t agree with you.
April 16, 2025 at 2:32 PM
I’ve argued legal fact which you have sought to entirely ignore. I believe in dealing with issues as they are, not jumping on the bandwagon and using hysterical inferences which do nothing to advance the cause. I understand that to change you have to talk with people who don’t agree with you.
Other than reasoned argument and an understanding of the legal process. But you’re right, just fling, it certainly has worked well in your country. You are more like Trump than you know.
April 16, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Other than reasoned argument and an understanding of the legal process. But you’re right, just fling, it certainly has worked well in your country. You are more like Trump than you know.
In which way? I’ve have sought for arguments from the centre ground, I believe that this obsessive focus on extreme acts in prisons muddies the waters and does nothing to further the rights of trans people. If you read the whole thread you will less
likely to be embarrassed.
likely to be embarrassed.
April 16, 2025 at 2:21 PM
In which way? I’ve have sought for arguments from the centre ground, I believe that this obsessive focus on extreme acts in prisons muddies the waters and does nothing to further the rights of trans people. If you read the whole thread you will less
likely to be embarrassed.
likely to be embarrassed.
Ah you’ve changed your description. Glad to see you are capable of listening to reasonable challenge.
April 16, 2025 at 2:19 PM
Ah you’ve changed your description. Glad to see you are capable of listening to reasonable challenge.
Why specifically focus on predatory cis men. Wouldn’t it be more inclusive merely to state that predatory people are the threat?
April 16, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Why specifically focus on predatory cis men. Wouldn’t it be more inclusive merely to state that predatory people are the threat?
Pretty sure the Nazi’s obsessed about much more than that.
April 16, 2025 at 1:49 PM
Pretty sure the Nazi’s obsessed about much more than that.
I’m encouraging you to engage with the wording and the basis of the appeal. You can either found your argument in fact or continue to scream into the vacuum.
April 16, 2025 at 1:44 PM
I’m encouraging you to engage with the wording and the basis of the appeal. You can either found your argument in fact or continue to scream into the vacuum.
Sorry I must have missed the quotation marks in your response. Obviously you’ve read the ruling so finding a direct quote wouldn’t be difficult for you.
April 16, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Sorry I must have missed the quotation marks in your response. Obviously you’ve read the ruling so finding a direct quote wouldn’t be difficult for you.