Epstein. Mass deportation excuse. Maybe oil/resources/wealth. Regime change? Maybe. To support his parolee so they can have more tech cities and money?
December 17, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Epstein. Mass deportation excuse. Maybe oil/resources/wealth. Regime change? Maybe. To support his parolee so they can have more tech cities and money?
My issue is when you open safari, click one tab then you have to click the three dots to then click on all tabs to see them all again. Right? Does this help that? I can’t seem to exit that tab/reduce that tab and then see the screen with all my tabs. Yes, I am one of those with tons of tabs open.
December 12, 2025 at 5:38 PM
My issue is when you open safari, click one tab then you have to click the three dots to then click on all tabs to see them all again. Right? Does this help that? I can’t seem to exit that tab/reduce that tab and then see the screen with all my tabs. Yes, I am one of those with tons of tabs open.
I really thought it would be Hegseth first.
December 7, 2025 at 6:31 AM
I really thought it would be Hegseth first.
He’s had some bad votes and bad judgment.
November 25, 2025 at 3:59 AM
He’s had some bad votes and bad judgment.
And that eagle looks rather Nazi-like.
November 23, 2025 at 11:19 PM
And that eagle looks rather Nazi-like.
I think she means after the midterms when Dems take the House. (And maybe the Senate.)
November 22, 2025 at 2:09 AM
I think she means after the midterms when Dems take the House. (And maybe the Senate.)
Don’t forget the Confederate flag.
November 21, 2025 at 1:05 AM
Don’t forget the Confederate flag.
While I agree they should keep saying this loudly and more people from the media and both sides need to call it out, enough with the strongly worded letter. The tide is turning. File Articles of Impeachment. They may not work this time, but who knows about next time. Capital Police investigate. Etc.
November 20, 2025 at 6:48 PM
While I agree they should keep saying this loudly and more people from the media and both sides need to call it out, enough with the strongly worded letter. The tide is turning. File Articles of Impeachment. They may not work this time, but who knows about next time. Capital Police investigate. Etc.
They should also file articles of impeachment and an actual criminal complaint. While nothing might happen, the tides are turning a bit. Let the public know that what he is doing is illegal and impeachable. This language was kind of weak. He’s not popular. Go on the offensive.
November 20, 2025 at 5:22 PM
They should also file articles of impeachment and an actual criminal complaint. While nothing might happen, the tides are turning a bit. Let the public know that what he is doing is illegal and impeachable. This language was kind of weak. He’s not popular. Go on the offensive.
And only arrested 100s out of all of that fraud?
November 19, 2025 at 1:45 AM
And only arrested 100s out of all of that fraud?
How can he be hiding this when it came out in 2016 and nobody cared? He’s been made President twice since.
November 19, 2025 at 1:22 AM
How can he be hiding this when it came out in 2016 and nobody cared? He’s been made President twice since.
He’s not hiding it if it already came out in 2016.
November 19, 2025 at 1:10 AM
He’s not hiding it if it already came out in 2016.
And, funny enough, they are only investigating Democrats!
November 19, 2025 at 1:04 AM
And, funny enough, they are only investigating Democrats!
But there is limiting language: “…would jeopardize an active Federal investigation or ongoing Federal prosecution, if the withholding or redaction is narrowly tai-
lored and temporary;
And they have to provide a report that lists what has been withheld (description) and the reason for withholding.
lored and temporary;
And they have to provide a report that lists what has been withheld (description) and the reason for withholding.
November 19, 2025 at 1:04 AM
But there is limiting language: “…would jeopardize an active Federal investigation or ongoing Federal prosecution, if the withholding or redaction is narrowly tai-
lored and temporary;
And they have to provide a report that lists what has been withheld (description) and the reason for withholding.
lored and temporary;
And they have to provide a report that lists what has been withheld (description) and the reason for withholding.
Not allowed by the bill. It might end up in court as a violation. A coverup won’t look good either.
November 19, 2025 at 12:36 AM
Not allowed by the bill. It might end up in court as a violation. A coverup won’t look good either.
The bill that just passed doesn’t allow that. It also doesn’t allow heavy redaction. Trump will be violating the law and it will look bad. The cover up can almost be worse than the crime. He will definitely look like he is guilty and involved in a coverup.
November 19, 2025 at 12:35 AM
The bill that just passed doesn’t allow that. It also doesn’t allow heavy redaction. Trump will be violating the law and it will look bad. The cover up can almost be worse than the crime. He will definitely look like he is guilty and involved in a coverup.
True! It’s all been rumor. But there is a lot of sexual assault issues in Trump’s past, hard to imagine he didn’t get involved. But you never know. That said the removal could be proven true or false by a whistleblower or in the future (Dem administration) using meta data and any “copy” not redacted
November 19, 2025 at 12:12 AM
True! It’s all been rumor. But there is a lot of sexual assault issues in Trump’s past, hard to imagine he didn’t get involved. But you never know. That said the removal could be proven true or false by a whistleblower or in the future (Dem administration) using meta data and any “copy” not redacted
Yeah, that’s how they pushed passage. I am interested to see what happens next.
November 18, 2025 at 11:55 PM
Yeah, that’s how they pushed passage. I am interested to see what happens next.
Yes! A bit unexpected. Let’s see what happens next. I do wonder if we will have a Nixon scenario…the coverup takes him down before the files can. Or if we get the full files. Seems like he is done if we do.
November 18, 2025 at 11:53 PM
Yes! A bit unexpected. Let’s see what happens next. I do wonder if we will have a Nixon scenario…the coverup takes him down before the files can. Or if we get the full files. Seems like he is done if we do.
But these people are not smart. They could think they scrubbed info and release without said info. It would then take a whistleblower to prove the cover up using meta data and other “copies” of the original documents. To which the regime will say fake news, etc. If so, think Nixon.
November 18, 2025 at 11:34 PM
But these people are not smart. They could think they scrubbed info and release without said info. It would then take a whistleblower to prove the cover up using meta data and other “copies” of the original documents. To which the regime will say fake news, etc. If so, think Nixon.
The real trick is if the Senate passes it as is. Either they refuse to take it up, fail to pass it, fail to pass it with a veto proof majority or pass it with amendments protecting Trump and others (or the full release) which then goes back to the House (with protections).
it.fail
November 18, 2025 at 9:20 PM
The real trick is if the Senate passes it as is. Either they refuse to take it up, fail to pass it, fail to pass it with a veto proof majority or pass it with amendments protecting Trump and others (or the full release) which then goes back to the House (with protections).
But Prop 50 relies on it happening in TX. No TX gerrymander, no CA. That’s what I thought.
November 18, 2025 at 8:15 PM
But Prop 50 relies on it happening in TX. No TX gerrymander, no CA. That’s what I thought.