We are working with new LP already. And hopefully it covers some of your comments. Rest I think I have to use my brain for now.
🙏
We are working with new LP already. And hopefully it covers some of your comments. Rest I think I have to use my brain for now.
🙏
But this we can solve I am pretty sure. :)
But this we can solve I am pretty sure. :)
With low traffic hard to know what works. But I 100% agree with you. I always suggest to early stage companies to write most simplest way what they offer.
With low traffic hard to know what works. But I 100% agree with you. I always suggest to early stage companies to write most simplest way what they offer.
No need to open your wallet but curious about the impression for fiidbakk.com
No need to open your wallet but curious about the impression for fiidbakk.com
How important it is is hard to say.
How important it is is hard to say.
? perhaps have one for the whole table.
Pretty simple style changes however they should improve the readability and reduce cognitive load a lot.
? perhaps have one for the whole table.
Pretty simple style changes however they should improve the readability and reduce cognitive load a lot.
Probably you could do #1 = nr1 Icond GOLD.
So 1-3 are medals. Then numbers.
Product name should be focus.
New badge now hangs pretty losely.
Tags maybe bit more muted and smaller.
For ⭐ I would consider connecting score + label so its one group and makes it more minimal. Perhaps bw stars.
Probably you could do #1 = nr1 Icond GOLD.
So 1-3 are medals. Then numbers.
Product name should be focus.
New badge now hangs pretty losely.
Tags maybe bit more muted and smaller.
For ⭐ I would consider connecting score + label so its one group and makes it more minimal. Perhaps bw stars.
However for each row.
However rest of the rows ideally should have as less everything as possible.
Avoid repeating labels. As much as possible same font sizes.
Regarding colors. Think tags are not nr1 yet they draw the eye.
However for each row.
However rest of the rows ideally should have as less everything as possible.
Avoid repeating labels. As much as possible same font sizes.
Regarding colors. Think tags are not nr1 yet they draw the eye.
It really depends on the product. For many I know they are fake. But even then reading it gives a good idea about the product maturity.
Are they fake fake. Or are they helpful fake and I know product owner tries to show some unique feature.
It really depends on the product. For many I know they are fake. But even then reading it gives a good idea about the product maturity.
Are they fake fake. Or are they helpful fake and I know product owner tries to show some unique feature.
Nothing will be pushed live but behind the scenes many great improvements are on the way.
You working with something?
Nothing will be pushed live but behind the scenes many great improvements are on the way.
You working with something?
Yellow on the icon has very low contrast. Font colors is probably borderline too.
Also I am not sure should it be warning. Amber feels even more towards red eg error.
Yellow on the icon has very low contrast. Font colors is probably borderline too.
Also I am not sure should it be warning. Amber feels even more towards red eg error.
Ideally I would do like 1-2 font sizes/weights. Min no of colors.
Remember I did do this for you :) But its still too colorful if I check it now.
Think there needs to be 1 single focus point. 1-2 additional tags to explain what it is.
Ideally I would do like 1-2 font sizes/weights. Min no of colors.
Remember I did do this for you :) But its still too colorful if I check it now.
Think there needs to be 1 single focus point. 1-2 additional tags to explain what it is.
If goal is less cognitive load. Simplify.
If everything needs to be important nothing is.
Maybe it design doesn´t move the needle in short term for ML however I am sure that finding out what matters and focusing in readability has long term effect for sure.
If goal is less cognitive load. Simplify.
If everything needs to be important nothing is.
Maybe it design doesn´t move the needle in short term for ML however I am sure that finding out what matters and focusing in readability has long term effect for sure.
Extra.
(Social) proof or validation. Also good to explain usage cases.
Urgency.
Avoid external links. Focus on narrative that there are people who make decisions fast and those who want to read more.
Test. Test more. Its a marathon not a sprint.
Extra.
(Social) proof or validation. Also good to explain usage cases.
Urgency.
Avoid external links. Focus on narrative that there are people who make decisions fast and those who want to read more.
Test. Test more. Its a marathon not a sprint.
Even though people claim there is a pattern. There is not.
In my opinion you should focus:
0.05 seconds. First impression. Quality layout. Trust.
2-5 seconds. Clear messaging. Offer. What is it? Why?
1/2
Even though people claim there is a pattern. There is not.
In my opinion you should focus:
0.05 seconds. First impression. Quality layout. Trust.
2-5 seconds. Clear messaging. Offer. What is it? Why?
1/2
Cheap exposure.
You get people liking you. Eg they hope you notice.
And in some perfect case you hire.
But going from indies to series D - some are always hiring for the same positions.
Cheap exposure.
You get people liking you. Eg they hope you notice.
And in some perfect case you hire.
But going from indies to series D - some are always hiring for the same positions.