the crazy thing is that just seems to be how they operate in general? some stuff is named but even this little gem (from 5 years ago) is also unsigned. most of their reviews are unsigned. just an outlet churning "content"

i can only speak for steam obviously, i decided to get them after the january sale and let's say that was a mistake (this is the bundle for the complete series)

i think something people arent discussing is how many of their reviews have no names attached to them. just a piece that was written somewhere by someone. noticed this by digging up an older piece. so why should your outlet be trusted then

ok but it's widely reviled by a *group* of people specifically. were that true, people wouldn't use those chatbots as much as they do. even in the context of "gamers", most do not care, as evidenced by how well The Finals did.

like honestly this is the state of my steam library. you are picking an argument with someone who LOVES playing games. all sorts of games. and i'm not picky about it. whether it's weird niche shit or pure mainstream stuff. i'm not exactly the steam median of 3 games played a year here

2/3rd of the review is bitching about the balance, the grind, and the bloated length, i dont think we read the same review. this little gem especially really gets me

y'all made a small typo.... sorry to point this out, it was killing me........ thank u for the review though.......

great things are happening

legendary bit

Fata morgana live reaction

read the fucking article good lord

unfortunately it's easier to post "i would rather the CEO hit the pavement" than read the article