Because his business and contracts can not exist without conflict of interests. He knows that.
Conflict of interest need political cover-up. C

Atlas Go...AhhhgggrrrrBrrrrr

Good of light! He realy said that?

Here is same positive moment...ISSRDC was very leaning to some prime contractors event. Colaboration with ASCEND can be a good possibility ( as I can see, AIAA and their partners try to be independent and safe place for scientists). ...

"Go back to whiteboard" - not...Whiteboards, windtunnels, themostructural fire lab its all "overregulation" and "anti - progress".
V1 and V2 have the same fuel systems issues, and I still do not know: "Why?" Why no one adressed that...In light of HLS...

Engine fu**ed capability 😆

Ohn...What you mean with that? You think she can be impact factor on NASA adm Decision

Conflict of interest and HLS plan agenda are playing big role...I can not be public about all.
Gateway cancellation support also was a big impact factor...

The SpaceX Rats run away after Starship incapability....( Sorry for harsh commentary) but true.

"Our management is not Boneless, they are Political Flexible" - 70% of Science Organisation in U.S. right now....

Trying to Stabilize Commercial Architecture...And Also hope for Congress and Sci-Community Reasonable Voices

Calm...weirdly calm...

First round of three weeks probationary ( test) period...Maybe it will immediately become clear how everything will go further with my future career path. Maybe not....

Now it's called "progressive deregulation"...

Unfortunately, this problem has been developing for a long time... The politicization of science led to the erosion of architecture, and the "convenient" began to be valued, not the "competent"