This article contains so much weakly researched conjecture and "recently I've read an interview with a tech- bro"-type anecdotes that it should not meet the editorial standards of this publication.

Unfortunately, Alcaraz said Trumps attendance sill be "good for tennis".

Is the driver ok?

Groundbreaking

I wonder how he'd call his own approach to Israel tho

The extremely based Rana Foroohar, to be exact, not sure if anyone at FT besides her.

To those without subscription, here's a gift link: www.nytimes.com/2025/02/08/o...
Worth reading the piece before discarding it based on the headline/lede

Did you bother to read the piece though?

Unfortunately, this article sounds a lot like purposeful relativisation of the problem. Can't debate hard data? Make the issue muddy and unclear, by providing "not so sure", "it depends" angles.

Thank you for your service