I mean, I guess I could go though every member of the House and Senate until I figure it out. It was probably someone in the House, as I suspect I would have recognized her if it was Senate. And no, it wasn't Spanberger or Sherrill. Pretty sure it was recent House or Senate.

I saw a clip of a woman in congress...I think she maybe had some kind of nat sec background or something like that...and she sounded pretty awesome. But I can't remember who it was, as I don't normally see her in the news. But she sounded like someone who might be a great leader. Wish I remembered.

What is this in reference to?

Probably for the best. Sprinkle some extra loss of court confidence from flawed procedure on to irritate the court before getting to a proceeding on a vindictive prosecution with lack of merit.

This goes back to my dogs vs cats theory of American politics. GOP is a the pack of dogs that follow the leader, and it is both their strength by winning by unity, and weakness when led by a tyrant. Dems are the cats, and while catty and disorganized, are highly resistant to tyrant leadership.

I'd do it, and the cesspool to me is motivation. Perhaps the bigger barrier to entry is affordability; I'm not giving up my career for the instability of an elected position. That's why you have career politicians. And maybe that is part of the bigger problem with politics.

I don't know, guys/gals, am I wrong? If you had Trump and some of his closest, hell his entire cabinet in a room and MTG was there as well, and you had to pick one to not betray America for a bribe or a sex slave or something, who would you pick? I'm not saying I like her, but I'd pick MTG.

I trust and respect her more than Tulsi Gabbard. I don't think Tulsi is on team America, and suspect she is undermining American national security. MTG is a classless, unqualified, thick headed, opportunist brute, but think at least she is our classless, unqualified, thick headed, opportunist brute.

Tom would probably make a better President, as a President can probably do pretty well by just identifying experts in the necessary subjects and utilizing their expertise. Would just need to contain the snark when dealing with other heads of state.

It demonstrated it's weakness, allowing itself to be overrun by extremists disloyal to the constitution and disloyal to their fellow Americans, throwing away all principle to indulge in it's worst impulses, and proving it cannot be trusted to govern responsibly.

I feel like there is something useful to extract here. Like a test you can make to filter out creeps you should never associate with. Creeps hide their creepy in person, but they can perhaps be outed with social media testing.

I'm only familiar with a couple of those. How many would you agree are indie? Silksong seems to be strongly considered to be indie. Clair Obscur doesn't feel indie. I wonder what their criteria for qualification is. Dev team has to be under some particular size?

I am starting to wonder if lobbing a vengeful no merit prosecution against the former head of one of the premier investigative law enforcement agencies in the world is going to backfire spectacularly. I hope I'll need some popcorn for this.

Another problem with Trump not always articulated is that he creates more extreme left leaning by validating the worst left views of the right. The right should seek to banish Trump, but so far few have. It's hard to defend conservative viewpoints in such a toxic environment.

Do you still wear a tie that neat?

Authoritarians are like feline ringworm.

Just finished adding this new feature. Only took a few hours. Now I can fly above a scene during play to monitor automated activities that only occur during play -- NPC movements, other elements in scene that react to various triggers. Should be helpful in polishing scenes.