And then we amplify the reaction to the lack of proper messaging so it looks even worse.

“Although the court order mandates an immediate halt…it was not immediately clear when or if they would fully comply. Nor was it clear how the attorneys general would monitor the administration’s actions.”

Now who enforces it?

We knew that when the crowdstrike ‘error’ happened and everything went dark.

They aren’t silent, they’re just not amplified, and there is no incentive to amplify, because all eyes are on the orange guy and his administration right now. They are loud and hogging all of the attention.

Is this an indefinite boycott?

Thank you for acknowledging this.

You get a social media company, you get a social media company, you get a social media company!

Mine happened in real life, in the form of, its job security.

We need multiple.

Rephrase it for the times: what are three things you would like archived online forever? This could be a picture of something meaningful, instructions of how to do something important, or links out to a a newspaper. Can I apply?

Complicit, complacent or a victim.

And just to spice up the conversation, Microsoft was the last company to face anti-trust consequences, which in my opinion led to the other four having great success.