In Montenegrin buldožer, with folk etymology buldožder (žder = devour) or even brdožder (~the one that devours a hill).
In Montenegrin buldožer, with folk etymology buldožder (žder = devour) or even brdožder (~the one that devours a hill).
Now we're back over here, check out our sister website where we publish blog pieces and interviews about the latest JLP articles.
👉 languageandpolitics.com
Now we're back over here, check out our sister website where we publish blog pieces and interviews about the latest JLP articles.
👉 languageandpolitics.com
If a reviewer rejects a manuscript because of huge methodological issues and the author(s) keep sending new versions of text, revised but not improved in methodology, how is it to be perceived? Is it a common thing? Is it rude?
If a reviewer rejects a manuscript because of huge methodological issues and the author(s) keep sending new versions of text, revised but not improved in methodology, how is it to be perceived? Is it a common thing? Is it rude?