Is the contradiction intentional?
November 18, 2025 at 7:22 AM
Is the contradiction intentional?
The script put words in the mouth of the scientist that Croxall knew he didn't use in the clip that was to follow. She fixed a badly written script, and she's being punished for it.
November 8, 2025 at 10:38 AM
The script put words in the mouth of the scientist that Croxall knew he didn't use in the clip that was to follow. She fixed a badly written script, and she's being punished for it.
Here is your claim. You have failed to back up why a male person had "every right" to be in a female only changing room.
September 2, 2025 at 6:23 PM
Here is your claim. You have failed to back up why a male person had "every right" to be in a female only changing room.
You seemed to be saying that the amendment is an example of sex used as a basis for *granting* rights, which you say should stop.
It doesn't do that, of course, but I don't know that you understand that.
It doesn't do that, of course, but I don't know that you understand that.
August 10, 2025 at 12:57 PM
You seemed to be saying that the amendment is an example of sex used as a basis for *granting* rights, which you say should stop.
It doesn't do that, of course, but I don't know that you understand that.
It doesn't do that, of course, but I don't know that you understand that.
Found it. It doesn't help you.
Believe me or don't. I don't care. I'm just saying I have reason to be confident.
share.google/a9iSkePgJaIP...
Believe me or don't. I don't care. I'm just saying I have reason to be confident.
share.google/a9iSkePgJaIP...
August 8, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Found it. It doesn't help you.
Believe me or don't. I don't care. I'm just saying I have reason to be confident.
share.google/a9iSkePgJaIP...
Believe me or don't. I don't care. I'm just saying I have reason to be confident.
share.google/a9iSkePgJaIP...
Gosh Dan, looking at that exchange, I'm pretty sure I'm not the one who needs to question my life choices.
July 31, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Gosh Dan, looking at that exchange, I'm pretty sure I'm not the one who needs to question my life choices.
If it's words and logic you like, feast your eyes on these.
April 21, 2025 at 12:30 PM
If it's words and logic you like, feast your eyes on these.
This kind, apparently. Not sure about obscure (men who hate women are all too common) but definitely anti-inclusive.
April 20, 2025 at 10:54 AM
This kind, apparently. Not sure about obscure (men who hate women are all too common) but definitely anti-inclusive.
This post on the other place makes the same claim tho presents it as positive. Is that also "anti-semitic"?
x.com/KeithWoodsYT...
x.com/KeithWoodsYT...
April 18, 2025 at 7:17 AM
This post on the other place makes the same claim tho presents it as positive. Is that also "anti-semitic"?
x.com/KeithWoodsYT...
x.com/KeithWoodsYT...
This is also wrong. FWS were not seeking a "victory over trans people". This is a victory *for* women just as it has always been about *women's* rights, not "trans rights".
It betrays the same bias that got us here to keep saying otherwise.
It betrays the same bias that got us here to keep saying otherwise.
April 16, 2025 at 2:54 PM
This is also wrong. FWS were not seeking a "victory over trans people". This is a victory *for* women just as it has always been about *women's* rights, not "trans rights".
It betrays the same bias that got us here to keep saying otherwise.
It betrays the same bias that got us here to keep saying otherwise.
I have begun reading. This is incorrect for a start. Everyone enjoys sex based protections as the sex they are and, where relevant, by perception as the opposite sex. Male people cannot have protections intended for women bc that makes them not work for women.
April 16, 2025 at 2:48 PM
I have begun reading. This is incorrect for a start. Everyone enjoys sex based protections as the sex they are and, where relevant, by perception as the opposite sex. Male people cannot have protections intended for women bc that makes them not work for women.
This was the best I could manage. I must up my game.
January 18, 2025 at 3:49 PM
This was the best I could manage. I must up my game.
On at least some issues, it's a sign of not having robust, well-developed arguments to hand. And on some others, it's a sign of your case being utterly without foundation.
To illustrate 👇
To illustrate 👇
November 17, 2024 at 5:52 PM
On at least some issues, it's a sign of not having robust, well-developed arguments to hand. And on some others, it's a sign of your case being utterly without foundation.
To illustrate 👇
To illustrate 👇
Here's what we're doing wrong, apparently.
Being "all logical".
Being "all logical".
November 16, 2024 at 3:41 PM
Here's what we're doing wrong, apparently.
Being "all logical".
Being "all logical".
I see your Loch Katrine and raise you Arran.
At sunset.
🫳🎤
At sunset.
🫳🎤
November 14, 2024 at 9:24 PM
I see your Loch Katrine and raise you Arran.
At sunset.
🫳🎤
At sunset.
🫳🎤
There's a pleasing amount of cat pictures here so far. Doing my bit to keep that going.
November 14, 2024 at 7:20 PM
There's a pleasing amount of cat pictures here so far. Doing my bit to keep that going.