For years, groups like NCOSE have used anti-porn advocacy as a gateway to broader censorship efforts, including restricting LGBTQ+ rights. Now, with NCMEC shifting its focus to align with these ideological forces, the question becomes: Who does this actually protect?

This move closely aligns with groups like the National Center on Sexual Exploitation whose board members have ties to SPLC-designated hate groups, including the Family Research Council & the American Family Association. These same organizations are connected to Project 2025.

NCMEC’s decision to erase any mention of trans youth under Trump’s executive order isn’t just about language—it’s about priorities. When a leading child protection organization bends to political pressure instead of focusing on all vulnerable children, it raises serious questions about its mission.

💯

Thanks for sending your own amicus brief.

I’ll read it inbetween trying to get abuse material of myself and others off the internet.

To frame this as “free speech” ignores the harm caused and misinterprets the purpose of the First Amendment, which was designed to protect discourse, not acts of violence that silence and dehumanize others.

Additionally, this conduct undermines the rights of victims to bodily integrity and personal security—rights that are fundamental to any functioning democracy.

The Supreme Court has held that certain categories of speech, such as obscenity, true threats, & speech integral to criminal conduct, fall outside First Amendment protection. NDII falls squarely into these exceptions, as it is integrally linked to criminal conduct