What are your thoughts? Here’s one: candidates should be informed of the reasons for their rejection. Something specific they can work on instead on going mad trying to work out why they weren’t selected. No chickening out by saying- lots of applications, can tell you why you weren’t good enough.

Haha

Cutest!

Absolutely! Let’s find a time to talk :)

And I argued that there was a core to the secularism doctrine in India. 🇮🇳

Anjali Rawat theorised on a right to convert within the right to religion in India🕉️☪️✝️🪯

Almas Shaikh’s paper showed how the current reservation law misses the most disadvantaged groups 🚷

Mihika Poddar’s paper was about dismantling the preconceptions that many have in the caste reservation debate, that caste certificates are actually very easy to obtain. She showed us the bureaucratic detail involved in them, which was eye-watering 👮🚔🗄️📑

@surbhikarwa.bsky.social took us through the debates on women’s reservation in the Constituent Assembly to show how they conceptualise equality, explaining the formal equality and indivisibility discourses that predomainted the discussion 🟰🚺

@rishikasahgal.bsky.social focussed our attention on the administrative processes that regulate a right to housing— notice, hearing, and engagement, and made a case for how courts have a regulatory role in this process🏘️

@rupavardhini.bsky.social 📝 clarified the semantic confusion on language debates in constitution making.

Massive thanks to Sheffield Law School and UNSW for sponsoring and supporting this!

Keep reading to see who participated and what they presented! 🧵

Please add me, if possible.

Congratulations, Sen!

My pleasure and toot toot!

Thanks SJ! What did you think of the turn of events?