Since using this simple trick, I’ve received more compliments on my presentations. People find them engaging and professional. Smooth transitions seem to help the audience follow my ideas more easily. (3/3)

When moving to the next slide, I signal the transition with a phrase like:

“Using this concept, I derive the result ___,” or
“This result motivates me to explore ___.”

As I say the blank, I click to reveal the next slide, where the blank is the title. (2/3)

My theory predicts how people make mental shortcuts about causality in strategic situations like this and act based on what they think is in their best interests.

Imagine you’re working at a company, and one day you receive a surprisingly low bonus. You don't know if it’s your manager’s decision or something beyond her control. Do you stay or quit? It's a tough decision because you don’t know the cause.

I like the notation in Osborne & Rubinstein (1994) the best and follow it mostly. I use i \in N for players, h \in H for histories, I in \mathcal{I} information sets.