Sundeep Braich
@sundeepbraich.bsky.social
Scatty Seeker | Uncovers | Writes | Talks
History • Legends • Heritage • Light ☀️
Koh-i-Noor diamond: a storied stone 💎
⚖️ Is Hades… history’s actuary?
📸Instagram @SundeepBraich
History • Legends • Heritage • Light ☀️
Koh-i-Noor diamond: a storied stone 💎
⚖️ Is Hades… history’s actuary?
📸Instagram @SundeepBraich
Reposted by Sundeep Braich
@alanlester.bsky.social
Looks like I’ve found a summary of the debate online.
Her new book subtly—and perhaps unintentionally—shows how these debates are shifting: from questions of ownership and reparations to questions about the logic of authority, privacy, exposure & dignity when the tables turn…
Looks like I’ve found a summary of the debate online.
Her new book subtly—and perhaps unintentionally—shows how these debates are shifting: from questions of ownership and reparations to questions about the logic of authority, privacy, exposure & dignity when the tables turn…
July 2, 2025 at 4:09 PM
@alanlester.bsky.social
Looks like I’ve found a summary of the debate online.
Her new book subtly—and perhaps unintentionally—shows how these debates are shifting: from questions of ownership and reparations to questions about the logic of authority, privacy, exposure & dignity when the tables turn…
Looks like I’ve found a summary of the debate online.
Her new book subtly—and perhaps unintentionally—shows how these debates are shifting: from questions of ownership and reparations to questions about the logic of authority, privacy, exposure & dignity when the tables turn…
Reposted by Sundeep Braich
How did the debate go?
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the double standards—and the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the double standards—and the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
July 2, 2025 at 12:58 PM
How did the debate go?
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the double standards—and the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the double standards—and the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
@alanlester.bsky.social
Looks like I’ve found a summary of the debate online.
Her new book subtly—and perhaps unintentionally—shows how these debates are shifting: from questions of ownership and reparations to questions about the logic of authority, privacy, exposure & dignity when the tables turn…
Looks like I’ve found a summary of the debate online.
Her new book subtly—and perhaps unintentionally—shows how these debates are shifting: from questions of ownership and reparations to questions about the logic of authority, privacy, exposure & dignity when the tables turn…
July 2, 2025 at 4:09 PM
@alanlester.bsky.social
Looks like I’ve found a summary of the debate online.
Her new book subtly—and perhaps unintentionally—shows how these debates are shifting: from questions of ownership and reparations to questions about the logic of authority, privacy, exposure & dignity when the tables turn…
Looks like I’ve found a summary of the debate online.
Her new book subtly—and perhaps unintentionally—shows how these debates are shifting: from questions of ownership and reparations to questions about the logic of authority, privacy, exposure & dignity when the tables turn…
@alanlester.bsky.social
How did the debate go?
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
How did the debate go?
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
July 2, 2025 at 1:01 PM
@alanlester.bsky.social
How did the debate go?
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
How did the debate go?
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
How did the debate go?
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the double standards—and the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the double standards—and the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
July 2, 2025 at 12:58 PM
How did the debate go?
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the double standards—and the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
She seems personable, but it’s the book that counts.
I’d recommend reading her new book on privacy with her earlier work. It shows the double standards—and the paradox between privacy & exposure. Debates about restitution, reparations, and digital exploitation are converging…
@garethknapman.bsky.social Good PR doesn’t make Keeping Their Marbles any less callous.
Byron warned us about Hireling Artists in The Curse of Minerva - defenders of theft who serve power, not the full truth.
If Jenkins calls scholars “activists” she can’t object to being called a Hireling Artist.
Byron warned us about Hireling Artists in The Curse of Minerva - defenders of theft who serve power, not the full truth.
If Jenkins calls scholars “activists” she can’t object to being called a Hireling Artist.
June 21, 2025 at 7:44 PM
@garethknapman.bsky.social Good PR doesn’t make Keeping Their Marbles any less callous.
Byron warned us about Hireling Artists in The Curse of Minerva - defenders of theft who serve power, not the full truth.
If Jenkins calls scholars “activists” she can’t object to being called a Hireling Artist.
Byron warned us about Hireling Artists in The Curse of Minerva - defenders of theft who serve power, not the full truth.
If Jenkins calls scholars “activists” she can’t object to being called a Hireling Artist.