Sulaiman Ilyas-Jarrett
sulaimanij.bsky.social
Sulaiman Ilyas-Jarrett
@sulaimanij.bsky.social
Ex UK Gov Advisor | Energy and Climate Policy | Host of Energy Revolution Podcast | Cambridge Fellow
And all for promises of 'growth' that will not materialise.
October 24, 2025 at 12:28 PM
It's disappointing seeing EU leadership slip on climate, but we carry on.
September 18, 2025 at 7:39 PM
The fact that clean tech is so modular and replicable compared to oil and gas or nuclear make them so much easier to bring down a cost curve!
September 18, 2025 at 9:32 AM
For a long time this was a non-starter though so at least welcome to see Treasury is open to the conversation.
September 17, 2025 at 5:24 PM
- Legacy renewable costs like the RO and FiT
- Hidden cost of high seabed leasing fees that rake in money for Treasury but are ultimately born by consumers
- Belated network upgrades that come through as standing charges
- Costs of newer expensive techs that will soon appear on bills
September 17, 2025 at 5:23 PM
If you're going to put things on tax I'd much rather see them go after other parts of the bill that arguably would sit better on taxation anyway, e.g.:
September 17, 2025 at 5:22 PM
The problem with focusing on just VAT is that it's both relatively marginal and it will mean the fixed costs that are left will make up a larger proportion of the bill, which could feed the (incorrect) narrative that it's net zero 'levies' that's making bills expensive.
September 17, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Reports from @thetimes.com that Rachel Reeves is considering removing VAT shows a growing awareness in gov that there are limited levers to get bills down this parliament - and many of them sit with treasury.
September 17, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Community energy is one of the biggest areas GBE can make a difference!

People need to feel a stake in the energy transition, and GBE can help make the economics stack up.
September 16, 2025 at 8:34 PM
This is the bit I found most interesting! Still picking through the report but yeah the increasing reliance on shale could mean that when viable output falls it falls much quicker than people expect.
September 16, 2025 at 4:17 PM
The number of leaps here is astounding 😅
September 9, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Will be watching this case like a hawk, will test how willing and able the courts are to reign Trump's direct assault on Wind.
September 5, 2025 at 12:47 PM
This is a good bit of nuance.

I'm still a bit conflicted on this but we probably do need to have a hierarchy of gas sources and encourage switching between them, but there's a risk this becomes a license to keep on building gas infrastructure because 'at least it's clean gas'.
September 2, 2025 at 11:44 AM
Ooh yes looks very interesting! Will check it out thanks.
September 2, 2025 at 11:28 AM