StuNotStuart
@stunotstuart.bsky.social
Cut off all funding for those who voted yes.
November 10, 2025 at 3:38 AM
Cut off all funding for those who voted yes.
I will do everything possible to make sure your primary opponent defeats you. I will donate, I will volunteer. And I will rejoice when you are gone.
November 10, 2025 at 3:23 AM
I will do everything possible to make sure your primary opponent defeats you. I will donate, I will volunteer. And I will rejoice when you are gone.
And that's supposed to invalidate it? This jackwagon never had a plan for the CR in February. He's actually a dumbass.
November 10, 2025 at 3:12 AM
And that's supposed to invalidate it? This jackwagon never had a plan for the CR in February. He's actually a dumbass.
This performative posturing for someone who's up for reelection in 26. Nothing more.
November 10, 2025 at 3:10 AM
This performative posturing for someone who's up for reelection in 26. Nothing more.
That's the exact message I left for Dem Senators.
November 10, 2025 at 2:58 AM
That's the exact message I left for Dem Senators.
I think its pretty clear that the classic squishes who are up in '26 didn't vote for this just because they're afraid of primaries and were given cover by retirees and those not up till 28 or 30.
They know we're pissed so they're hiding the ball.
They know we're pissed so they're hiding the ball.
November 10, 2025 at 2:14 AM
I think its pretty clear that the classic squishes who are up in '26 didn't vote for this just because they're afraid of primaries and were given cover by retirees and those not up till 28 or 30.
They know we're pissed so they're hiding the ball.
They know we're pissed so they're hiding the ball.
Go fuck yourself. Retire immediately you waste of space.
November 10, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Go fuck yourself. Retire immediately you waste of space.
Nobody up in 26 voted yes. None of the usual squishes; Warner, Coons, Ossoff, Kelly, Gillibrand voted yes. The retirees gave them cover.
Looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a large group going against his wishes.
They know we're pissed, so they're hiding the ball.
Looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a large group going against his wishes.
They know we're pissed, so they're hiding the ball.
November 10, 2025 at 2:05 AM
Nobody up in 26 voted yes. None of the usual squishes; Warner, Coons, Ossoff, Kelly, Gillibrand voted yes. The retirees gave them cover.
Looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a large group going against his wishes.
They know we're pissed, so they're hiding the ball.
Looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a large group going against his wishes.
They know we're pissed, so they're hiding the ball.
Funny... nobody that's up in 2026 voted for it. None of the usual squished, like Warner and Coons voted for it....
But the retirees and th9se not up until 2030 gave them cover.
This looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a very large group going against his wishes.
But the retirees and th9se not up until 2030 gave them cover.
This looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a very large group going against his wishes.
November 10, 2025 at 1:59 AM
Funny... nobody that's up in 2026 voted for it. None of the usual squished, like Warner and Coons voted for it....
But the retirees and th9se not up until 2030 gave them cover.
This looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a very large group going against his wishes.
But the retirees and th9se not up until 2030 gave them cover.
This looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a very large group going against his wishes.
Funny... nobody that's up in 2026 voted for it. None of the usual squished, like Warner and Coons voted for it....
But the retirees gave then cover.
This looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a large group going against his wishes.
But the retirees gave then cover.
This looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a large group going against his wishes.
November 10, 2025 at 1:54 AM
Funny... nobody that's up in 2026 voted for it. None of the usual squished, like Warner and Coons voted for it....
But the retirees gave then cover.
This looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a large group going against his wishes.
But the retirees gave then cover.
This looks like it was specifically planned by Schumer, or there is a large group going against his wishes.
Regardless, it means he's a failure.
November 10, 2025 at 1:45 AM
Regardless, it means he's a failure.
This is gonna be hilarious. Gonna be a gift that keeps on giving.
November 7, 2025 at 2:10 PM
This is gonna be hilarious. Gonna be a gift that keeps on giving.
All that, plus I couldn't take it if the team with a fan base and a radio broadcast crew that don't understand the basic ground rules won the World Series.
November 2, 2025 at 4:28 AM
All that, plus I couldn't take it if the team with a fan base and a radio broadcast crew that don't understand the basic ground rules won the World Series.
I think you mean "The The Angels Angels of Anaheim".
October 29, 2025 at 2:36 AM
I think you mean "The The Angels Angels of Anaheim".
Please ask your regular guest, @sanders.senate.gov, why he doesn't think SS tattoos are disqualifying.
That can never be okay. And when we are fighting active racists in the right wing it makes us, progressives, look morally bankrupt.
Bernie must remove that endorsement.
That can never be okay. And when we are fighting active racists in the right wing it makes us, progressives, look morally bankrupt.
Bernie must remove that endorsement.
October 22, 2025 at 2:39 AM
Please ask your regular guest, @sanders.senate.gov, why he doesn't think SS tattoos are disqualifying.
That can never be okay. And when we are fighting active racists in the right wing it makes us, progressives, look morally bankrupt.
Bernie must remove that endorsement.
That can never be okay. And when we are fighting active racists in the right wing it makes us, progressives, look morally bankrupt.
Bernie must remove that endorsement.
Given the weight they still have, they have been a net negative on American society in this century.
October 20, 2025 at 1:34 AM
Given the weight they still have, they have been a net negative on American society in this century.
Nope. Jedd Fisch says no to that!
October 18, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Nope. Jedd Fisch says no to that!
To me, Krueger will always be the guy that advocated trading Adam Jones straight up for a lefty reliever. I have never listened to a word he said after that.
October 16, 2025 at 4:08 AM
To me, Krueger will always be the guy that advocated trading Adam Jones straight up for a lefty reliever. I have never listened to a word he said after that.