stul.bsky.social
stul.bsky.social
@stul.bsky.social
Jonathan Turley, is that you?
October 19, 2025 at 7:10 AM
Wonderful tweet
May 27, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Plus the recourse to a Kozinski quote too. Only the best…
May 17, 2025 at 9:54 AM
Fascism
May 9, 2025 at 12:25 PM
I would be concerned with counsel’s candour if I was a judge reading this side by side the government’s brief…
April 18, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Howard Lutnick, is that you?
April 3, 2025 at 11:55 PM
Precisely. That a conservative supporter of Trump can write the section about the necessity of accepting election defeat without any apparent irony just places him outside of any sense of shared reality with me (unless the comment about eschewing democracy is a threat/promise)
March 30, 2025 at 12:23 AM
Please do a deep dive. Your takedowns bring me joy in dark times
March 23, 2025 at 7:18 PM
I think that is clearly correct but also not necessarily in contrast to this message. In terms of social media messaging I don’t think it is a problem to try to humanise a victim of what is an inhumane program - that is, putting a face to the victims.
message.in
message.in
March 23, 2025 at 7:14 PM
“Properly understood, this duty requires a president not to enforce unconstitutional statutes or powers even after the Supreme Court has wrongly upheld them.” And here I was thinking that Article III established that the court said what the law was…
March 21, 2025 at 8:11 PM
You failed
March 15, 2025 at 2:15 AM
And being a ‘principled conservative’ apparently refers solely to reaching conservative / revanchist outcomes, not to any philosophy or methodology…
March 13, 2025 at 11:26 AM
Are you sure that Illyan Wuman hasn’t found a 16th century English case that says it’s ok?
March 11, 2025 at 2:46 AM
Interesting that they don’t mention police unions which probably have the most corrosive impact of any collective bargaining institution
March 8, 2025 at 2:32 PM
The dissent is wild
March 5, 2025 at 2:28 PM