Hope you feel better soon.

I'm guessing pamonha

Colab with granpa when

That's a shame but these are pretty cool too

Yesss awesome, have fun haha!

I don't know your platform of choice but please consider minesweeper games with no-guessing mode!! minesweeper[dot]online has it in-browser and for download, and antimine is one android option

I'm very happy with how your game looks too hahaha. The pallette rocks hard and it's intricate with detail but not busy in an unpleasant way, I love the look to bits, specially the little ladies with the wriggling heads

...to the "this person thinks pedophilia is not the main enabler of csa -> this person is a pedophile -> this person is a predator/threat/suspect actor in this discussion and shouldn't be heard" leap

I agree that it's not equivalent at all. Yet being a slur or not doesn't matter when it comes to the point that it's dangerously overused as shorthand...

@/acvalens.com is a trans sex worker and journalist that has recently been getting pedo allegations because she regularly discusses her current stance that protesting payment processor and general censorship involves strategically defending erotic drawings of fictional children existence as content

I see your point, there's also this survey www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... sections 4.2 and 4.4 seem speciffically relevant

It's only a slur in the strictest sense that most name-calling is slurring, but the point is that pedojacketing keeps being used to shut down people saying that csa discussion needs to move away from pedophilic attraction as the enabler of csa

It doesn't come from csam distribution, it come from law enforcement reports. Page 2 here www.ojp.gov/sites/g/file...

? You argued that, and you were focused on the attraction. You "just think that arguing that not all people who molest or rape children are pedophiles is a useless point to bring up" and wonder "why the distinction matters in any way whatsoever"

No one is denying that or thinking first of the poor pedophiles, but rather insisting that the pedophilic
attraction is not what enables csa to happen and is therefore a useless thing to focus on and scaremonger about

I don't endorse the unironic use of "spitting facts" but I do the rest. Pedojacketing those who insist with evidence that what enables and exacerbates csa is not the attraction itself is what got people who can't get over knee-jerk disgust harassing Patricia Taxxon and indeed, isuggestforcefem