stovel98.bsky.social
@stovel98.bsky.social
“You have a problem with Val, but you never say anything when it’s [my examples]?!”
“Okay, show me official merch of [your examples].”
“Are you stupid? [My examples] aren’t even a close comparison!”

Still waiting on links, bud. Feel free to adjust to your specifications if it makes you feel better.
February 11, 2025 at 7:25 PM
Alright, you got me. I’ll admit it, I was wrong… send me a link to official, sexualized Valentine’s Day merch of those people. The Joker, Afton, Frollo, Beatlejuice, Jimmy, Darth Vader & Homelander, too. Been hearing a lot of those. Links to OFFICIAL, SEXUAL merch of them, and I’ll eat crow for you.
February 11, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Hey pot, name’s kettle. We met? 🤝You can block me anytime… but you don’t… could prevent everyone from seeing my messages, and me from ever responding again… but you haven’t 🤔 You’re equally hungry for attention and validation from strangers online. How about it, counselor. You concur?
February 11, 2025 at 5:41 AM
docs.google.com/document/d/e...
Damn, what’s so funny? I thought you were like, idk, totally into putting energy into real crimes and shit? I agree tho, assault and battery is a hilarious crime. Top 3 funniest. But maybe something like this is more serious, up your alley, oh Great Judiciary?
The power of words: when fandom kills
docs.google.com
February 11, 2025 at 5:38 AM
x.com/kovox/status...

I couldn’t agree more! Since you’re such a paragon of justice, one who specializes in REAL people doing REAL crimes… can you start with this one? Even has the bonus of being a cosplayer at a con 😉
x.com
x.com
February 11, 2025 at 4:38 AM
What you’ve missed is a handful of comments expressing that I believe profiting off of, specifically, sexualized merch of a rapist character is disgusting.
Having, liking, or even selling merch of a villain is 100% fine. But SEXUAL merch of a rapist on Valentine’s Day? Really couldn’t skip that one?
February 11, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Are you a SA victim, or person with common sense, who thinks perhaps it’s a bit tasteless to profit off of a character whose literal only character traits are “is a rapist”? Mosco will set you straight! Show you why it’s stupid to not give Vivzie your money-- uh, I mean, not support rapist merch.
February 11, 2025 at 1:56 AM
You heard it here first, folks! Wee Lass Reacts thinks profiting off of rapist/sex trafficking characters (profiting almost exclusively off of merchandise of said rapist/trafficker that’s sexual in nature) is a bad take! Think making money off rape is bad? Mosco will gladly have a word with you!! ☺️
February 11, 2025 at 1:54 AM
Honestly, I can’t blame you, fam. Vivzie is your cash cow. Selling out any morals is just what we do these days. If you wanna fight tooth and nail to defend Vivzie’s right to sexualize and sensationalize a rapist for profit… that’s just what you gotta do. Otherwise, Vivzie might not DM you anymore 😔
February 11, 2025 at 1:15 AM
Sounds good! While you continue to shower Vivzie with money all for a chance to eat dinner with her at a con 😉, I’ll continue to not! Go ahead and keep up the good fight. While I’m sure you’ve harassed and reformed countless criminals, I’ll continue to harass grifters who profit off rape. Godspeed 🫡
February 11, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Never said we have to abide by me, just that it’s fucking gross to profit off shit like that. Are you deaf? I’ve said before write villains. Good stories need villains. Fucking hell, some of the best get into taboo subjects and shed light on them… just don’t make fucking money on a rapist dog 😭😭
February 11, 2025 at 12:53 AM
You mean my logic that sexual exploitation, rape, and trafficking is INHERENTLY worse than essentially any other crime? And that rape should, out of any crimes depicted, be one not sensationalized for merchandise?
The logic that, on a fundamental level, rape should never be profited off of???
February 11, 2025 at 12:41 AM
Let’s take this from the top, one last time: Is it okay to profit off of rape? Is it okay to profit off of sexual trafficking? Is it tasteful to make a T-shirt of Ted Bundy in lingerie saying “Fuck me”? Clearly not. But all those principles can be put aside for PROFIT solely because “It’s not real”?
February 11, 2025 at 12:29 AM
So that’s all it takes, huh? Just because something’s fictional it’s okay? Rape is totally okay and cool to sensationalize & profit off of because it didn’t actually happen? Simple as that, really? If that’s how you truly feel, then I think the case is I cannot help you.
February 11, 2025 at 12:19 AM
Would NOT selling sexualized merchandise of a RAPIST/SEX TRAFFICKER be a good start? Would saying something like, “Valentino is a despicable villain, any and all merch of him will be considered thoughtfully,” not be good? Not normalizing profiting off of wooby uwu rapists would help that goal… no???
February 11, 2025 at 12:13 AM
Also, “fictional cartoon character” is such a soft, kiddy way to write “rapist/sex trafficker.” He’s not some Saturday morning Power Puff Girls villain. He’s a vile slime-ball, the worst a “human” being could possibly be. Stories need villains, but does merchandise need a SEXY RAPIST SERVING CUNT???
February 11, 2025 at 12:04 AM
So there’s absolutely no problem with profiting off of SEXUALIZED merch of a rapist? That’s okay, making money off that cuz it’s fictional? Rape is fine and to profit off it is okay because it happened on a TV screen apparently. Funny how you only address that part, not the morality of rape merch 🤷
February 11, 2025 at 12:01 AM
@vivziepop.bsky.social You got yours fans doxxing themselves over merch of a rapist/trafficker 😭 Come get your kids and put em to bed, Vivzie. This can’t be real, a fan doxxing themselves to earn good boy points for you. Vivzie… do something about your fans. It ain’t just the haters that need help 😭
February 10, 2025 at 11:39 PM
Okay bro, give me your first & last name, address, credit card number, and the 3 digits on the back… then I’ll give you mine. Defend her with your chest out, and I’ll “hate” her with mine. Tee hee, lol, xD, etc.
February 10, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Weird tangent from my point, but I’ll indulge you. My problem with Vivzie’s merch is the fact she’s selling sexualized merch of a rapist/trafficker. I think there’s a clear difference between a figure of a psychopath and sexualized merch of a RAPIST. Now go on, tell me how it’s not that different 🙄
February 10, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Bruh.
February 10, 2025 at 11:11 PM
So, sexualized merch of a rapist/sex trafficker is okay simply because we can ignore it… no problem with the thought of profiting off sexualized merch of a RAPIST/SEX TRAFFICKER… because it can be ignored. With this logic, I can say rape itself isn’t a problem cuz it can be ignored, no? 🤷🤷
February 10, 2025 at 10:51 PM
You should actually watch it. Unless you’re such a great judge of good/bad faith critique you don’t even need to watch it to tell. Cuz otherwise, seems like a biased point of view. And again, you seem to really be latching to the con thing… since you know what happens at cons, any word on Michael K?
February 10, 2025 at 10:49 PM
Damn, y'all are masters of psychoanalyzing “haters.” Apparently can read their minds and intentions with that star gate in your room. But anytime it’s Vivzie… it’s always more nuanced than that. The evidence is faked, she wouldn’t do that, there’s more context to it… funny that.
February 10, 2025 at 10:38 PM