Wasn’t laziness but the policy at the time of isolationism. The American governments of that time believed the rest of the world had nothing to offer them so why bother with the rest of the world. Which still prevailed in certain ways today how many Americans have ever traveled abroad.

As part of the common wealth when Britain sent out the call Canada Australia India New Zealand and many others joined the fight. America sat on the side lines until Japan attacked.

How would that work leaves us without a back up

What the hell is happening at Man U

Next week starting which week

Odd thought could the release clause have a time limit and Forest are trying to stall to get past that time limit?

What language is “it”

A happy July the 4th

That’s sounds good until you start having mold issues

Future back 3 these 2 and Van da ven. With Danso and Phillip’s as back up or rotation.

Highlight the lack of taste in whomever made it.

The distinction is already there no need to add a label. It may have been added to a slang dictionary but it not in the Collins. You can add any made up word to a slang dictionary or online one. It’s agree to disagree on this one.

Gone my whole life knowing that so don’t need a label and one that’s made up the literally doesn’t appear anywhere in the dictionary. You do not need to label more than one part to differentiate. Trans is trans

Here’s another study by a black professor this time who set out to prove that America police are racist.

youtu.be/9OJLa81VD1Q?...

As I’ve said it’s a feeling and holds no logic but I do take offence of it’s a pointless addition I am male end of story why do I need another label? Doesn’t matter if I’m gay or not I don’t want another label.

Disagree like most offensive words it’s how it make you feel it’s not logical and terms and meanings change over time plus it’s how it’s said any word can be a swear word with right emphasis when my father used to swear he used Nora Batty. When the far left use CIS it’s emphasised is this way.

See cis is a made up word and comes across as demeaning and offensive . Nobody who is centrally inclined will say they don’t exist. As for children learning they exist isn’t the issue giving those same kids blockers now that a whole new ball game. Time of sex eduction is more the issue.

That’s taking a small portion of a larger data set because it suites the narrative and is trotted out all the time. The full data this professor can explain it far better until I saw this I believed the narrative because that’s what is pushed on social media
youtu.be/FBpPSVQHSmk?...

Yes and no saying you can not be something which you are is just nuts. But looking down and deriding those who are “straight” amounts to the same thing. Pushing those views on to children is particularly disingenuous.